At 04:23 PM 2/12/2002 +0100, Roel Rozendaal - IC&S wrote:
* Speed.Postgresql is way slower than mysql. Way.
Given that you staunchly refused to do a vacuum until the DB grew to 5GB,
that's hardly surprising.
Most benchmarks show that MySQL is substantially superior fo
Philip Warner wrote:
Most benchmarks show that MySQL is substantially superior for one or a
few clients, but that for high concurrency/high load PG wins. This of
course assumes that both databases were configured and tuned properly...
Again, this is almost certainly tuning parameters. I had
At 03:30 PM 2/12/2002 -0800, Joby Walker wrote:
What tuning have you done to Postgres and what is your regular maintenance
schedule?
Some of the basic factors from a PG point of view (these are my view on
things based on using PG and the general advice found on the lists and
documentation):
At 05:16 PM 3/12/2002 +1100, Philip Warner wrote:
set max_fsm_pages to 4
vacuum every two hours
vacuum 'users' every 5 min
analyze every hour
dbmail-maintenance -p -d -f daily.
I should have mentioned two things:
(a) with the above settings, the server load is minimal (<1), CPU is 80-90%
Using dbmail-imapd with a german outlook express 6.0 makes outlook
waiting forever for a response... while trying to create standard
folders when initializing the imap account on first login...
Log says:
Dec 3 12:45:50 dnsc2 dbmail/imap4[4028]: COMMAND: [0039 CREATE
"Entw&APw-rfe"]
How and where
Append an ampersand to the following array in imap4.c
const char AcceptedMailboxnameChars[] =
"abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789-=/ _&";
Hans
Hi hans,
could you try the latest CVS? It should be fixed by now.
regards roel
Hans Kula heeft op dinsdag, 3 dec 2002 om 14:58 (Europe/Amsterdam) het
volgende geschreven:
"Entw&APw-rfe"
After testing i found one more character to add: "," and "&"
It seems as if oe is escaping special chars with &xxx- and &x,x- ...
so array in imap4.c must look like this:
const char AcceptedMailboxnameChars[] =
"abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789-=/ _&,";
Hans
Hi Roel,
The latest CVS contains the following array:
const char AcceptedMailboxnameChars[] =
"abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789-=/ _.&";
The char "," is missing...this is for the german &szml; char.
regards hans
- Original Message -
From: "Roel Rozendaal
Not sure if this is what you need to reference, but
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2060.html section "5.1.3. Mailbox
International Naming Convention" has a pretty good summary of acceptable
mailbox name characters.
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 03:22, Hans Kula wrote:
> Hi Roel,
>
> The latest CVS contai
Hi Richard,
thx for pointing to this rfc...
Another point is http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2045.html which explains the
base64 alphabet:
6.8. Base64 Content-Transfer-Encoding
This section contians:
...
62 +
63 /
(pad) =
...which means that also the "+" character is missing.
As stated in http:/
Yes! Finally :)
This is the official announcement of dbmail 1.0 stable!
You can download it at our all new dbmail website (www.dbmail.org).
Major updates:
- imap commandline scanner is now fully RFC compatible
- new server code for both imap and pop servers
- many little bugfix
Dont' forget to announce on freshmeat; the rc4 announcement never made it!
(so, to be sly, you could announce rc4 today, and announce 1.0 later this
week... just to get a bit more "front page time" to spread the word ;-)
Aaron
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, IC&S Helpdesk wrote:
> Yes! Finally :)
>
> This
hehehe
well, unfortuanatly, i already announced it :)
Best regards,
eelco
On dinsdag, dec 3, 2002, at 19:34 Europe/Amsterdam, Aaron Stone wrote:
Dont' forget to announce on freshmeat; the rc4 announcement never made
it!
(so, to be sly, you could announce rc4 today, and announce 1.0 later
th
Hi everybody,
Some patches are not yet incorporated in dbmail 1.0. That doesn't mean
that they are not good enough. We tried to compile a stable package
which should be quick easy to setup. All new features (and a lot of
patches) will be added to the new 1.1 branch.
1.0 will only be used for
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 11:38 am, IC&S Helpdesk wrote:
> Yes! Finally :)
>
> This is the official announcement of dbmail 1.0 stable!
> You can download it at our all new dbmail website (www.dbmail.org).
>
> Major updates:
> - imap commandline scanner is now fully RFC compatible
> - new
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 12:49, Eelco van Beek - IC&S wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Some patches are not yet incorporated in dbmail 1.0. That doesn't mean
> that they are not good enough. We tried to compile a stable package
> which should be quick easy to setup. All new features (and a lot of
> patc
Ummm the dbmail-1.0/sql/mysql/* files are all empty in the
dbmail-1.0.tgz
file. I would assume that they are supposed to have the sql
descriptions in
them. :-)
argghhh...
thanks a lot. I've fixed it right away. Only the innodb files and the
autoreply are missing. Roel, can you send them to
The autoconf fixes should have went in before 1.0, as it is now the
autconf stuff shipped with 1.0 doesn't coexist well with non autoconf
builds and is partially broken. They definately need to go in botht he
1.0 and 1.1 branches. They really should have went in at 1.0 or had
autoconf removed be
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 14:05, Eelco van Beek - IC&S wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> We tried to incorporate autoconf in 1.0 but unfortunatly our autoconf
> guy is on a 6 month leave and Roel and I are working on other stuff. To
> fill in for the miss we incorporated a build script which should be
> suffi
I just did a CVS update of dbmail 1.0 and all files in
/dbmail/sql/mysql are empty
there is a small typing error in the INSTALL file
the line
mysql -u root -p < sql/mysql/create_tables.sql ( IS )
mysql -u root -p < sql/mysql/create_tables.mysql( SHOULD BE )
Hans Kula ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait:
>
>
>After testing i found one more character to add: "," and "&"
>
>It seems as if oe is escaping special chars with &xxx- and &x,x- ...
>
>so array in imap4.c must look like this:
>
>const char AcceptedMailboxnameChars[] =
>"abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEF
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 2:04 pm, Eelco van Beek - IC&S wrote:
> argghhh...
> thanks a lot. I've fixed it right away. Only the innodb files and the
> autoreply are missing. Roel, can you send them to me?
>
When do you expect to have these up? I was going to switch over to 1.0 but I
wanted to
23 matches
Mail list logo
