[Dbmail] trackrecord

2003-12-03 Thread
Hi all, We'd like to create a trackrecord of dbmail usage in all it forms and shapes on www.dbmail.org. Please reply to this message with your configuration with as much information as you're willing to share! Thanks, Eelco

RE: [Dbmail] trackrecord

2003-12-03 Thread Jesse Norell
Hello, Our main mail system includes one database server (postgresql), 2 mx hosts for processing Internet-inbound mail and 2 pop3/smtp hosts for our customers. All running debian, on i686. We've kept pretty up-to-date on dbmail 1.0->1.1->1.2 series code, always with custom patches, but are wor

RE: [Dbmail] trackrecord

2003-12-03 Thread Jason Burfield
We use the following: 1 database server (MySQL v4) 2 mx hosts 1 pop server We also use IMAP to serve mail to to clients via a browser using Squirrelmail, however the IMAP port is not open to the rest of the world, only the internal network between servers. We currently only have around 500 user

RE: [Dbmail] trackrecord

2003-12-03 Thread Michael Rose
We're using the following: Server: P800Mhz, 1GB RAM, OS: RedHat Linux 8, Software: MySQL, DBmail (IMAP/POP3), PHP, Postfix, Squirrel mail Users: 2000+ DBmail version: pre-1.0 DBmail DB Size: ~6GB We also have a backup mail serve

Re: [Dbmail] trackrecord

2003-12-03 Thread Micah
hmm.. sent the previous reply with the wrong account.. I'll do it again: OS: Redhat 7.2 DB: MySQL 4.1, no tricks. MTA: Postfix 1.1, MySQL support for reading alias tables and domain tables.. RBL blocking and header/body checks. DBMail 1.1, no patches, just out of CVS. 313 users right now, and

Re: [Dbmail] trackrecord

2003-12-03 Thread Ryan Butler
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 09:47, Eelco van Beek - IC&S wrote: > Hi all, > > We'd like to create a trackrecord of dbmail usage in all it forms and > shapes on www.dbmail.org. > Please reply to this message with your configuration with as much > information as you're willing to share! > > Thanks, >

RE: [Dbmail] trackrecord

2003-12-03 Thread Shih Ming-Wei
2 x Sun Sparc E220 in failover - Dual CPU 2x450Mhz UltraSparc IIi - 1 GB MEM - running postfix + dbmail 1.1. -> 1.2 -> 1.2.1 + dbmail-pop3d - 15 K users - Mysql 4.0.x - OS: Gentoo/Linux - antivirus + antispam software cheers Mign-Wei

RE: [Dbmail] trackrecord + (Scalability REPOST)

2003-12-03 Thread Mark Mackay - Orcon
>From a recent post I made for the trackrecord list: Status: O > We're currently running dbmail with: > - Dual Xeon 2.4G processors / SCSI Disks > - MySQL/InnoDB > - roughly 90k mailboxes > - 100G of mail data > - alias selection offloaded to smtp servers (we don't use aliases table we deliver str

Re: [Dbmail] trackrecord + (Scalability REPOST)

2003-12-03 Thread
hi Mark, The thing i can tell you about scalability is this: - you need a clusterable database (For 2.0 you should be able to write a oracle driver in about 4 hours). (real clustered databases partition automatically). - you'll need the LMTP daemon, not dbmail-smtp (increase in speed and ha

Re: [Dbmail] trackrecord + (Scalability REPOST)

2003-12-03 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
Eelco van Beek - IC&S wrote: hi Mark, The thing i can tell you about scalability is this: - you need a clusterable database (For 2.0 you should be able to write a oracle driver in about 4 hours). (real clustered databases partition automatically). ok - you'll need the LMTP daemon, not d