RE: [Dbmail] dbmail upgrade from dbmail-1.1 to dbmail 1.2.3

2004-02-20 Thread Jesse Norell
Hello, Your 1.1 table will work under 1.2.3. The only change I can think of in about that timeframe was an alter of the passwd field in users table from 32 to 34 chars (to support md5 hashed passwords). Check that, and alter if it's not 34, and you're good to go. Original Message Fr

Re: [Dbmail] Using transport map for $mydestination

2004-02-20 Thread Jeff Brenton
Hello David, D> Hi, someone mentioned using the transport map for D> mydestination field. What is postfix expecting as the D> return and what should the transport table look like? D> i.e. fields. When querying the table for mydestination, postfix ONLY needs to have a valid row returned. When qu

[Dbmail] dbmail upgrade from dbmail-1.1 to dbmail 1.2.3

2004-02-20 Thread armin langhofer
hi i want to upgrade from 1.1 to 1.2.3. just wanted to ask if tables changed? can i simply compile 1.2.3 and copy over existing binaries? best regars, armin.

Re: [Dbmail] Postfix with IMAP

2004-02-20 Thread Paul J Stevens
David, You should fix your smtpd_recipient_restrictions parameter. The fine manual reads: # reject_unauth_destination: reject mail unless it is sent # - to destinations matching $inet_interfaces, $mydestination, # or $virtual_maps. # - to destinations matching $relay_domai

RE: [Dbmail] Using transport map for $mydestination

2004-02-20 Thread John Hansen
David,. Could you point me to where I can download these patches? ... John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 7:52 PM To: dbmail@dbmail.org Subject: [Dbmail] Using transport map for $mydestination Hi, s

[Dbmail] Using transport map for $mydestination

2004-02-20 Thread David
Hi, someone mentioned using the transport map for mydestination field. What is postfix expecting as the return and what should the transport table look like? i.e. fields. I finally got postfix recompiled with Postgres patches and would like to give that a try. Thanks, David __

Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-maintenance -f

2004-02-20 Thread
Yes that's no problem at all. Cheers, Eelco On 20-feb-04, at 1:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can i run safely "dbmail-maintenance -f" while postix and dbmail-imapd and dbmail-imapd are accesing the dbmail mysql database. Thanks Jacques ___ Dbmai

RE: [Dbmail] 2.0 RC2 problem ..

2004-02-20 Thread Chingson Chen
Appreciate that. weDBmail is the fastest web mail system to handle large mail boxes. Chingson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jesse Norell Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 12:12 AM To: dbmail@dbmail.org Subject: RE: [Dbmail] 2.0 RC2 problem ..

[Dbmail] Corection of users.c in release 1.2.3

2004-02-20 Thread jacques-beaudoin
I reported a "quota bug" in user.c that was un version 2.0rc2 and in version 1.2.3. Changes where made in 2.0rc2 but not in 1.2.3 Since release 1.2.3 is the official release of dbmail i think correction should be made also to release 1.2.3 Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Montreal

RE: [Dbmail] 2.0 RC2 problem ..

2004-02-20 Thread Chingson Chen
the maillog is as attached. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mikael Syska Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 9:33 PM To: dbmail@dbmail.org Subject: SV: [Dbmail] 2.0 RC2 problem .. Yes > -Oprindelig meddelelse- > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re[3]: [Dbmail] Postfix with IMAP

2004-02-20 Thread Jeff Brenton
Hello David, D> Jeff, referencing a table in the database sounds like D> a great idea. I will give that a try. I am using D> Postgres so I will probably need to do a bit of D> recompiling. I had a link to the Postgres patch for Postfix, but it was for a non-current version. Everywhere I found t

[Dbmail] dbmail-maintenance -f

2004-02-20 Thread jacques-beaudoin
Can i run safely "dbmail-maintenance -f" while postix and dbmail-imapd and dbmail-imapd are accesing the dbmail mysql database. Thanks Jacques