(this mail is easier to read with a fixed charset)
Hi, I have a question to the SQL gurus on this list. I've extended the
domains table to resolve the n:m relation customer <-> domaingroups:
CREATE TABLE zmi_domains (
domain_idnr BIGSERIAL UNIQUE, --- domain id
domain
On Montag, 18. Dezember 2006 10:59 Aaron Stone wrote:
>Each time a dbmail- binary is executed, a new connection to the
> database is created.
I see and understand.
> Why they didn't just use VRFY I do not know -- then it could have hit
> the same LMTP server it would next hit to do the actual del
On Dec 17, 2006, at 2:11 PM, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Hi,
Aaron/Paul and other developers,
Before read this, i'm not asking nothing, this is just something
that came to my mind.
How about to have a antivirus integration in dbmail-lmtpd ?
something like make the email get scanned by a shell scri
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 09:19 +0100, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> > Perhaps a solution is to have a 'dbmail-checkaddr' that returns 0 or
> > 1 depending on whether or not the given address can be delivered at
> > all? Bad news is that this would have horrible scalability issues
> > unless it were a dae
Michael Monnerie wrote:
>
> Yes, it did then. Maybe that would be worth a Wiki entry? Should I? Can
> I? I think more (accurate) documentation would be nice.
Please do.
--
Paul Stevens p
On Montag, 18. Dezember 2006 09:23 Paul J Stevens wrote:
> > Problem 1:
> > dbmail creates a header like
> > X-DBMail-PhysMessage-ID:94348
> > on messages.
>
> That's a feature added because of popular request.
Yes, and I find it good. It's just good-to-know with imapsync.
> Those are both gmime
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> Hello list, maybe somebody ever wants to sync via imapsync from cyrus.
> I've fiddled with it these last 2 days, and found this to be useful:
>
> imapsync --host1 cyrushost --user1 u1 --password1 p1 \
> --host2 dbmailhost --user2 u2 --password2 p2 \
> --authmech1 LOGI
On Montag, 18. Dezember 2006 06:08 Aaron Stone wrote:
> Patience, patience. Nobody's in a rush to overhaul the way we resolve
> deliveries. Even if it's only a couple hours of coding, it's tens or
> hundreds of hours of thinking it through.
Of course. I didn't want the solution right now, but the
On Montag, 18. Dezember 2006 06:02 Aaron Stone wrote:
> > Why not throw the address as received from the MTA into dbmail, and
> > the "rewriting" is done there? It makes sense to do it there:
>
> So DBMail does the rewrite before delivery.
Yes, but the MTA doesn't have to care about anymore, which
