Re: [Dbmail] DBMail wiki spam?

On 5/23/2013 11:55 PM, Paul J Stevens wrote: > On 05/17/2013 11:17 AM, Thomas Raschbacher wrote: >> On 2013-05-17 10:39, Robert C. Sheets wrote: >>> There was a recent thread about this same topic and replacing the wiki >>> software. I think Paul was considering Conf

Re: [Dbmail] DBMail wiki spam?

There was a recent thread about this same topic and replacing the wiki software. I think Paul was considering Confluence. Did anything ever come of that? -- Robert C. Sheets Picosecond Software ___ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org http

Re: [Dbmail] Spam on the wiki

27;ve used Confluence before and was rather impressed, FWIW. -- Robert C. Sheets Picosecond Software ___ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Re: [Dbmail] Spam on the wiki

On 4/1/2013 7:28 AM, Paul J Stevens wrote: On 04/01/2013 03:53 PM, Robert C. Sheets wrote: Lots of spam seems to have been added to the wiki recently. See http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/start?do=recent for a list. There are several pages of new spammy articles. Who is able to delete

[Dbmail] Spam on the wiki

help with this if assistance is needed. -- Robert C. Sheets Picosecond Software ___ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Re: [Dbmail] not in ubuntu

oo old, or is there something else making it inappropriate to package? Thanks, -- Robert C. Sheets Picosecond Software ___ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Re: [Dbmail] URGENT: Accidentally delete mail user with dbmail-users -d

; really delete the purge like we do with messages. I like this idea a lot. Are there any great reasons not to do this? -- Robert C. Sheets Picosecond Software ___ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

[Dbmail] Safe to use multiple 2.2.x releases at once?

Would there be any problem having two 2.2.x MXes running at once against the same backend database? Specifically I'm thinking of one server with 2.2.9-1ubuntu1 (from hardy) and one server with 2.2.11-1 (from jaunty beta). How cautious do I need to be with this? -- Robert C. Sheets Picos

Re: [Dbmail] Simple test for database schema version?

Paul J Stevens wrote: That's a 2.2 schema Thank you very much! -- Robert C. Sheets Picosecond Software ___ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Re: [Dbmail] Simple test for database schema version?

Michael Monnerie wrote: On Freitag 06 Februar 2009 Robert C. Sheets wrote: I'm almost certain it would've been a 2.2 version, but the servers are long since gone so I can't actually check. Restore the DB then show us which tables exist now. Then it's possible to see wh

Re: [Dbmail] Simple test for database schema version?

ies. Cool. If I happen to get it horribly wrong and attempt to run a 2.2 version against a 2.3.x database schema, would you expect everything to fail in some very obvious way, or might things seem to work fine for a while and then catch fire later? -- Robert C. Sheets Pico

[Dbmail] Simple test for database schema version?

make any schema changes. Given just the database tables, is there a way to tell whether any updates are needed to get up to the current schema? -- Robert C. Sheets Picosecond Software ___ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org https://mailman.fastxs.