Re: [Dbmail] Performance Issues

2003-02-10 Thread Tim Uckun
the CPU once. :wq Tim Uckun US Investigations Services/Due Diligence http://www.diligence.com/

Re: [Dbmail] Exchange compatibility

2003-02-07 Thread Tim Uckun
in the rest of the groupware tools. The feb issue of Linux Journal had a nice article on reverse engineering of exchange. IMAP was a part of it but there are other parts as well (as I am sure you are aware). If you have not read it yet you want to pick up an issue. :wq Tim Uckun US Investigations

Re: [Dbmail] DATETIME vs TIMESTAMP

2003-02-05 Thread Tim Uckun
At 09:29 AM 2/5/2003 +0100, you wrote: works on my postgresql.. I'm using 7.2.1; i tried the following in the psql program: It did not work on 7.3.1. Perhaps they changed it. :wq Tim Uckun US Investigations Services/Due Diligence http://www.diligence.com/

Re: [Dbmail] HOW-TO?

2003-01-20 Thread Tim Uckun
. I have no idea if qmail is able to read from a database. :wq Tim Uckun US Investigations Services/Due Diligence http://www.diligence.com/

Re: [Dbmail] How scalable is it?

2002-12-18 Thread Tim Uckun
that's great. Have you thought of using a non IMAP client for employees which taps into the database directly? I was thinking that might be good way to go internal employees and it would bypass whatever IMAP slowness there might be. :wq Tim Uckun US Investigations Services/Due Diligence http

Re: [Dbmail] Dbmail on freebsd.

2002-12-13 Thread Tim Uckun
You fail to mention how you are trying to build 1.0, with the old build system, with the build.sh script for 1.0 or the autoconf in 1.0? Sorry I was using build.sh :wq Tim Uckun US Investigations Services/Due Diligence http://www.diligence.com/

Re: [Dbmail] Dbmail on freebsd.

2002-12-13 Thread Tim Uckun
. Since webmin can connect to it as well I figure it's some weird problem but I probably don't need to worry about it yet. Is this a myodbc problem or what? Thanks. :wq Tim Uckun US Investigations Services/Due Diligence http://www.diligence.com/