I'm getting ready to install dbmail for a client. I am wondering what
the general consensus is about using dbmail from CVS right now. Is it
stable? I know there have been a lot of changes since 1.1.
I use dbmail 1.1 and it works but I have some issues where email
addresses don't display correct
i can't say about the future but till now, the cvs version has always
been the less buggy and most stable :-)
Matthew T. O'Connor heeft op vrijdag, 6 jun 2003 om 17:20
(Europe/Amsterdam) het volgende geschreven:
I'm getting ready to install dbmail for a client. I am wondering what
the gene
It's stable...but...
If your clients use Outlook Express (for whatever reason) the following
limitations apply.
I am using a very recent CVS checkout of the DBMail source
1. Some messages will have their sender's name appear in quotes (").
This screws up sorting
2. Mailboxes don't get automa
Sorry all, I forgot
The problem with addresses not being displayed correctly is because
dbmail will just quote every address it finds, regardless of whether it
is quoted already or not. For instance:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Becomes:
From "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
While:
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]
your right chris, these should be fixed ASAP.
Hoping to make a great dbmail-dev-weekend,
roel
Chris Nolan heeft op vrijdag, 6 jun 2003 om 17:37 (Europe/Amsterdam)
het volgende geschreven:
It's stable...but...
If your clients use Outlook Express (for whatever reason) the
following limitat
Two things:
1) Anyone have any experience using Outlook as opposed to OE? I have
played with it a little and it seems to work better than OE.
2) I am seeing another problem, and I have posted it before with a link
to a screen capture of OE, but kmail has the same issue. The problem is
that the
I have played with Outlook as well as OE and they seem to share most of
their IMAP implementation. Issue No. 4 that I mentioned definitely
happens with Outlook. If memory serves me correctly, the other three
also happen with Outlook.
Damned Windows softwareMozilla Mail runs under Linux so
