Re: [Dbmail] why does my systemd-services not work? (dbmail-imapd)

2011-06-16 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 16.06.2011 13:41, schrieb Tomasz Torcz: On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:25:40PM +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote: On 06/16/2011 01:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: you can see the master-porcess and a child shortly in ps aux but after a few seconds systemd changes to deactivating (stop-sigterm) and is

Re: [Dbmail] why...?

2009-04-10 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Donnerstag 09 April 2009 Josh Marshall wrote: Since dbmail-util tries to recreate date field before the other, missing, field, and fails because the unique restraint stops it, it stops trying to recreate the other header fields. So it never gets to fix the real problem. I'll have a look

Re: [Dbmail] why...?

2009-04-09 Thread Josh Marshall
The -b check of dbmail-util will lookup all physmessages that don't have an entry in dbmail_headervalue. If for some reason that happens to be the case, while the other cache tables still contain entries for that message, subsequent dbmail-util -by runs will fail. Should a bug report

Re: [Dbmail] why...?

2009-04-06 Thread Andrea Brancatelli
Il giorno dom, 29/03/2009 alle 14.53 +0200, Paul J Stevens ha scritto: 00:00:00' for key 2] [INSERT INTO dbmail_datefield (physmessage_id, datefield) VALUES (467171,'1970-01-01 00:00:00')] How do I fix this? dbmail-util doesn't fix it in any way. Remove the entries that are in the way. In

Re: [Dbmail] why...?

2009-03-29 Thread Paul J Stevens
and...@brancatelli.it wrote: 00:00:00' for key 2] [INSERT INTO dbmail_datefield (physmessage_id, datefield) VALUES (467171,'1970-01-01 00:00:00')] How do I fix this? dbmail-util doesn't fix it in any way. Remove the entries that are in the way. In the example above: delete from

Re: [Dbmail] why...?

2009-03-29 Thread Aleksander Kamenik
Paul J Stevens wrote: The -b check of dbmail-util will lookup all physmessages that don't have an entry in dbmail_headervalue. If for some reason that happens to be the case, while the other cache tables still contain entries for that message, subsequent dbmail-util -by runs will fail. Should

Re: [Dbmail] why...?

2009-03-29 Thread Paul J Stevens
Aleksander Kamenik wrote: Paul J Stevens wrote: The -b check of dbmail-util will lookup all physmessages that don't have an entry in dbmail_headervalue. If for some reason that happens to be the case, while the other cache tables still contain entries for that message, subsequent dbmail-util

[Dbmail] why...?

2009-03-28 Thread andrea
Why? Repairing DBMAIL for cached header values... Ok. Found [4] un-cached physmessages. Mar 29 03:20:52 mela.raged.it dbmail-util[56101]: Error:[sql] dbmysql.c,db_query(+290): [Duplicate entry '467171-1970-01-01 00:00:00' for key 2] [INSERT INTO dbmail_datefield (physmessage_id, datefield)

Re: [Dbmail] Why pure selects?

2004-11-30 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Hi Joshua, you're correct, DBMail does not use Cursors. This is because MySQL does not support cursors. The code bases for the MySQL and PostgreSQL are mostly the same. Ahh o.k. Although I appreciate the need to keep things simple, the PostgreSQL should probably be gone through. MySQL and

[Dbmail] Why pure selects?

2004-11-29 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Hello, It appears that dbmail is using standard selects and not cursors for pulling data. Is there any reason why? Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of PostgreSQL Replication, and plPHP. Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.