Re: [Dbmail-dev] Congrats on 2.0rc1, and a little fix to misc.c

2004-01-31 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Aaron, > The new delivery chain requires a temporary account with the fixed user id > number 0. The next release candidate should probably include an appropriate > insert/update to add this user (note that it needs to be an insert and then an > update, because the insert alone with '0' triggers

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Congrats on 2.0rc1, and a little fix to misc.c

2004-01-31 Thread Aaron Stone
The new delivery chain requires a temporary account with the fixed user id number 0. The next release candidate should probably include an appropriate insert/update to add this user (note that it needs to be an insert and then an update, because the insert alone with '0' triggers the auto_increment

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Congrats on 2.0rc1, and a little fix to misc.c

2004-01-31 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Aaron, > This code's going to need a lot of hammering on. Ilja and I just worked out > some of the major kinks in the new delivery chain on Monday / Tuesday of this > week, so beta testers are really, really needed to help make this thing solid! I took current cvs code and have several problem

[Dbmail-dev] segfault during list command in imapd

2004-01-31 Thread Christian G. Warden
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 06:21:52PM +0100, Ilja Booij wrote: > This is still a testing release. Please test it at your site (I'm > running DBMail 2.0 in parallel with 1.2.3 here at IC & S) and let's > squash the bugs turn up. I'm getting a segfault when issuing the following command: list "" "%"

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: [Dbmail] DBmail 2.x, PostgreSQL, IMAP

2004-01-31 Thread Sandino Araico Sanchez
Ilja Booij wrote: Sandino, could you try recompiling with TRACE_TO_SYSLOG (in debug.c) set to 0 (zero), and running again. I didn't hace time to recompile, but seems to be already fixed in my last cvs update Maybe there's an error earlier in the code, which will show up in a different p