The following bug has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=070
==
Reported By:danweber
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=066
==
Reported By:ilja
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=066
==
Reported By:ilja
Assigned To:
Dan Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Solution A:
If you remember from before, I implemented a full libtool setup
and it dynamically loaded libraries. This is one way to go, but may
not make sense in the long run.
It's our present course, and a very good one. The libtool setup is great
Aaron Stone wrote:
Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi all, especially Aaron,
Is it intended behaviour that the following command:
./dbmail-users -a ilja -w secret -s [EMAIL PROTECTED]
does *not* add the alias?
I've made a small patch to fix this, but I was wondering if this might
The following bug has been ASSIGNED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=069
==
Reported By:va1210
Assigned To:
The following bug has been RESOLVED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=069
==
Reported By:va1210
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=070
==
Reported By:danweber
Assigned
Hi all (esp Dan),
I've been working on the packaging for 2.0.0 and noticed the libdbmail.so.0.0.0
differs between the mysql and postgresql builds. objdump reveals dependencies on
either the mysql or postgresql libs.
Currently all binaries are linked with the libdbmail.so. This libdbmail.so
The following bug has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=071
==
Reported By:paul
Assigned To:
Aaron Stone wrote:
Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi all, especially Aaron,
Is it intended behaviour that the following command:
./dbmail-users -a ilja -w secret -s [EMAIL PROTECTED]
does *not* add the alias?
I've made a small patch to fix this, but I was wondering if this might
The following bug has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=072
==
Reported By:paul
Assigned To:
The following bug has been ASSIGNED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=071
==
Reported By:paul
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=071
==
Reported By:paul
Assigned To:
The following bug has been RESOLVED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=071
==
Reported By:paul
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=072
==
Reported By:paul
Assigned To:
The following bug has been ASSIGNED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=066
==
Reported By:ilja
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=072
==
Reported By:paul
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=066
==
Reported By:ilja
Assigned To:
The following bug has been RESOLVED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=066
==
Reported By:ilja
Assigned To:
Aaron Stone wrote:
Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
That would imply parsing every message on delivery..would that make
sense? A lot of messages don't have to be parsed, because they're only
retreived using POP. Sounds like a waste of resources to me, unless we
have other reasons to
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=072
==
Reported By:paul
Assigned To:
Ilja Booij wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
That would imply parsing every message on delivery..would that make
sense? A lot of messages don't have to be parsed, because they're
only retreived using POP. Sounds like a waste of resources to me,
unless we
Hi,
RFC 2086 defines the special user 'anyone' to change rights for every
user (for example make a mailbox readable for every user - that's what I
try to do). Am I right that 'anyone' isn't implemented yet?
Thomas
--
http://www.tmueller.com for pgp key (95702B3B)
DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist dbmail-dev@dbmail.org on Monday, August
23, 2004 at 15:16 +0100 wrote:
Ilja Booij wrote:
Doesn't it make sense to parse the message only the first time it's
fetched? Messages read using
IMAP will only have to be parsed once. Messages read using POP will not
Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
RFC 2086 defines the special user 'anyone' to change rights for every
user (for example make a mailbox readable for every user - that's what I
try to do). Am I right that 'anyone' isn't implemented yet?
I've just looked through the code and through the rfc. I
Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi Ilja,
I've added a small patch in the bugtracker that will set the postmaster
address (as taken from dbmail.conf) as
the From: address. I'll also attach it here.
This does not doing anything else though..
Can you people test this?
Doesn't work, the from
The following bug has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=073
==
Reported By:ilja
Assigned To:
The following bug has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=074
==
Reported By:ilja
Assigned To:
The following bug has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=076
==
Reported By:ilja
Assigned To:
The following bug has been CONFIRMED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=076
==
Reported By:ilja
Assigned To:
The following bug has been CONFIRMED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=075
==
Reported By:ilja
Assigned To:
The following bug has been CONFIRMED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=074
==
Reported By:ilja
Assigned To:
Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Aaron Stone wrote:
Wolfram A. Kraushaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Correction (previous diff won't work at all - this one might have a chance)
I think this is an excellent idea, though the timing is unfortunate.
Absolutely this should go into HEAD. I'd like to
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=070
==
Reported By:danweber
Assigned
Aaron Stone wrote:
Dan Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Solution B:
I have been following libdbi very closely. libdbi is a database
abstraction layer in C. Its not bulky like odbc, and its quite like the
perl DBI. Basically a move to a single driver libdbi would make sense
because you
Matthew T. O'Connor matthew@zeut.net said:
Aaron Stone wrote:
Dan Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Solution B:
I have been following libdbi very closely. libdbi is a database
abstraction layer in C. Its not bulky like odbc, and its quite like the
perl DBI. Basically a move to a single
The following bug has been REOPENED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=071
==
Reported By:paul
Assigned To:
38 matches
Mail list logo