[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000070]: Fails to give reponse upon completion of rcpt

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been SUBMITTED. == http://dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=070 == Reported By:danweber Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000066]: imapsync doesn't always work when folders are non-existent

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=066 == Reported By:ilja Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000066]: imapsync doesn't always work when folders are non-existent

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=066 == Reported By:ilja Assigned To:

Re: [Dbmail-dev] 2.1 database backends

2004-08-23 Thread Aaron Stone
Dan Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Solution A: If you remember from before, I implemented a full libtool setup and it dynamically loaded libraries. This is one way to go, but may not make sense in the long run. It's our present course, and a very good one. The libtool setup is great

Re: [Dbmail-dev] why doesn't 'dbmail-users -a ... -s' add aliases?

2004-08-23 Thread Ilja Booij
Aaron Stone wrote: Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hi all, especially Aaron, Is it intended behaviour that the following command: ./dbmail-users -a ilja -w secret -s [EMAIL PROTECTED] does *not* add the alias? I've made a small patch to fix this, but I was wondering if this might

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000069]: Error in MySQL InnoDB-Migration script

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been ASSIGNED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=069 == Reported By:va1210 Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000069]: Error in MySQL InnoDB-Migration script

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been RESOLVED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=069 == Reported By:va1210 Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000070]: Fails to give reponse upon completion of rcpt

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=070 == Reported By:danweber Assigned

[Dbmail-dev] libdbmail

2004-08-23 Thread Paul J Stevens
Hi all (esp Dan), I've been working on the packaging for 2.0.0 and noticed the libdbmail.so.0.0.0 differs between the mysql and postgresql builds. objdump reveals dependencies on either the mysql or postgresql libs. Currently all binaries are linked with the libdbmail.so. This libdbmail.so

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000071]: dbmail-readvut is unused and should be removed

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=071 == Reported By:paul Assigned To:

Re: [Dbmail-dev] why doesn't 'dbmail-users -a ... -s' add aliases?

2004-08-23 Thread Ilja Booij
Aaron Stone wrote: Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hi all, especially Aaron, Is it intended behaviour that the following command: ./dbmail-users -a ilja -w secret -s [EMAIL PROTECTED] does *not* add the alias? I've made a small patch to fix this, but I was wondering if this might

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000072]: man pages in wrong section

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=072 == Reported By:paul Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000071]: dbmail-readvut is unused and should be removed

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been ASSIGNED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=071 == Reported By:paul Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000071]: dbmail-readvut is unused and should be removed

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=071 == Reported By:paul Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000071]: dbmail-readvut is unused and should be removed

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been RESOLVED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=071 == Reported By:paul Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000072]: man pages in wrong section

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=072 == Reported By:paul Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000066]: imapsync doesn't always work when folders are non-existent

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been ASSIGNED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=066 == Reported By:ilja Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000072]: man pages in wrong section

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=072 == Reported By:paul Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000066]: imapsync doesn't always work when folders are non-existent

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=066 == Reported By:ilja Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000066]: imapsync doesn't always work when folders are non-existent

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been RESOLVED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=066 == Reported By:ilja Assigned To:

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail IMAP server info: this message could not be

2004-08-23 Thread Ilja Booij
Aaron Stone wrote: Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: That would imply parsing every message on delivery..would that make sense? A lot of messages don't have to be parsed, because they're only retreived using POP. Sounds like a waste of resources to me, unless we have other reasons to

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000072]: man pages in wrong section

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=072 == Reported By:paul Assigned To:

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail IMAP server info: this message could not be

2004-08-23 Thread Paul J Stevens
Ilja Booij wrote: Aaron Stone wrote: Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: That would imply parsing every message on delivery..would that make sense? A lot of messages don't have to be parsed, because they're only retreived using POP. Sounds like a waste of resources to me, unless we

[Dbmail-dev] ACLs: 'anyone' not implemented ?

2004-08-23 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, RFC 2086 defines the special user 'anyone' to change rights for every user (for example make a mailbox readable for every user - that's what I try to do). Am I right that 'anyone' isn't implemented yet? Thomas -- http://www.tmueller.com for pgp key (95702B3B)

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail IMAP server info: this message could not be

2004-08-23 Thread Ilja Booij
DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist dbmail-dev@dbmail.org on Monday, August 23, 2004 at 15:16 +0100 wrote: Ilja Booij wrote: Doesn't it make sense to parse the message only the first time it's fetched? Messages read using IMAP will only have to be parsed once. Messages read using POP will not

Re: [Dbmail-dev] ACLs: 'anyone' not implemented ?

2004-08-23 Thread Ilja Booij
Thomas Mueller wrote: Hi, RFC 2086 defines the special user 'anyone' to change rights for every user (for example make a mailbox readable for every user - that's what I try to do). Am I right that 'anyone' isn't implemented yet? I've just looked through the code and through the rfc. I

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail IMAP server info: this message could not be

2004-08-23 Thread Ilja Booij
Thomas Mueller wrote: Hi Ilja, I've added a small patch in the bugtracker that will set the postmaster address (as taken from dbmail.conf) as the From: address. I'll also attach it here. This does not doing anything else though.. Can you people test this? Doesn't work, the from

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000073]: ACL is broken. It doesn't implement the 'anyone' user.

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=073 == Reported By:ilja Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000074]: FETCH MSGNUM (RFC822.HEADER) returns headers in wrong order.

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=074 == Reported By:ilja Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000076]: messages with only 1 header line, with no body are not accepted

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=076 == Reported By:ilja Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000076]: messages with only 1 header line, with no body are not accepted

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been CONFIRMED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=076 == Reported By:ilja Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000075]: IMAP message parser sometimes chokes on message that are probably allright.

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been CONFIRMED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=075 == Reported By:ilja Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000074]: FETCH MSGNUM (RFC822.HEADER) returns headers in wrong order.

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been CONFIRMED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=074 == Reported By:ilja Assigned To:

Re: [Dbmail-dev] RE: Patch for pipe.c

2004-08-23 Thread Aaron Stone
Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Aaron Stone wrote: Wolfram A. Kraushaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Correction (previous diff won't work at all - this one might have a chance) I think this is an excellent idea, though the timing is unfortunate. Absolutely this should go into HEAD. I'd like to

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000070]: Fails to give reponse upon completion of rcpt

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=070 == Reported By:danweber Assigned

Re: [Dbmail-dev] 2.1 database backends

2004-08-23 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
Aaron Stone wrote: Dan Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Solution B: I have been following libdbi very closely. libdbi is a database abstraction layer in C. Its not bulky like odbc, and its quite like the perl DBI. Basically a move to a single driver libdbi would make sense because you

Re: [Dbmail-dev] 2.1 database backends

2004-08-23 Thread Aaron Stone
Matthew T. O'Connor matthew@zeut.net said: Aaron Stone wrote: Dan Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Solution B: I have been following libdbi very closely. libdbi is a database abstraction layer in C. Its not bulky like odbc, and its quite like the perl DBI. Basically a move to a single

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000071]: dbmail-readvut is unused and should be removed

2004-08-23 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been REOPENED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=071 == Reported By:paul Assigned To: