Add:
TRACE_SYSLOG=1
TRACE_STDERR=0
to your dbmail.conf as documented in the example config.
This one had me stumped as well last week :-(
Oleg Lapshin wrote:
Hello.
I compiled dbmail rev 1940.
Run dbmail-imapd and no messages at all.(TRACE_LEVEL=5)
no forking, no work.
I attach
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 14:05 +0300, Oleg Lapshin wrote:
В сообщении от 16 декабря 2005 13:44 Paul J Stevens написал(a):
Add:
TRACE_SYSLOG=1
TRACE_STDERR=0
to your dbmail.conf as documented in the example config.
This one had me stumped as well last week :-(
Sorry ;)
Output:
The problem was that you didn't have the two config items TRACE_SYSLOG
and TRACE_STDERR. I thoughlessly made those mandatory with a stupid
fatal error message.
NO!
When I try to run dbmail-imapd with this in config:
TRACE_LEVEL=5
TRACE_SYSLOG=1
TRACE_STDERR=0
host=localhost # host for
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 14:24 -0800, Kevin Brown wrote:
Geo Carncross wrote:
I know we talked about this earlier, but I think for 2.2 we need to make
it possible to have multiple queries- we talked about it per database
layer, but why not a global conformance level setting?
DB_CAN_VIEW
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 14:16 -0800, Kevin Brown wrote:
Paul J Stevens wrote:
And I suspect 5.0 will be become a requirement for 2.3+ so we can
start working with views, triggers, etc...
Hmm...that would imply ditching SQLite, wouldn't it?
Not that I have a problem with that, mind you.
There're not fatal. But when they are missing there's no logging at all!
Which effectively hides the cause of any fatal errors :-)
Aaron Stone wrote:
That's dumb, why are those TRACE_FATAL when not found? I just copied it
twice more to the new options; I don't think any failure to find the
Geo Carncross wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 14:16 -0800, Kevin Brown wrote:
Paul J Stevens wrote:
And I suspect 5.0 will be become a requirement for 2.3+ so we can
start working with views, triggers, etc...
Hmm...that would imply ditching SQLite, wouldn't it?
Not that I have a
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 11:11 -0800, Kevin Brown wrote:
Geo Carncross wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 14:16 -0800, Kevin Brown wrote:
Paul J Stevens wrote:
And I suspect 5.0 will be become a requirement for 2.3+ so we can
start working with views, triggers, etc...
Hmm...that would
