A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=265
==
Reported By:idk
Assigned To:paul
=
Anton Zakatov wrote:
>
> PJ> That query is designed to find header blocks that are not marked as
> PJ> such. This change will break that.
>
> This my mistake. I thought that this select used to remove blocks
> without headers.
It does. Your query looks like an improvement after all. I've run it
Hello, Paul!
You wrote to "DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist" on Thu,
19 Apr 2007 20:17:21 +0200:
PJ> Did you try to compile with all modules and unit-testing enabled?
PJ> Sqlite is broken by the patch.
Sorry about sqlite and pg modules - I use mysql and remove it from configure
not long ago.
N
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=572
==
Reported By:jasb
Assigned To:
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=517
==
Reported By:Anne
Assigned To:
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=553
==
Reported By:nethzt
Assigned To:
==
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=572
==
Reported By:jasb
Assigned To:
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=572
==
Reported By:jasb
Assigned To:
A correction to my earlier mail.
Paul J Stevens wrote:
> @@ -1647,12 +1645,17 @@ int db_icheck_isheader(GList **lost)
[snip]
> That query is designed to find header blocks that are not marked as
> such. This change will break that.
On second reading it looks valid after all.
--
