+1 on rimap
only downside is plaintext passwords for the db.
but screw it lol its *so easy* to set up.
On 12/06/12 17:33, Paul J Stevens wrote:
On 06/11/2012 03:05 PM, Jack Montana wrote:
Hi all
I successfully use dbmail with postfix.
Today I wanted to make postfix perform SASL authentication
On 13/02/11 23:43, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Howdy Paul,
Today I woke up and was thinking on one tool that could give me the
current status of POP3D and IMAPD and also LMTPD.
The idea is to see in the moment, who's downloading data from POP3D or
IMAPD.
There's yet no tool to see this, is it?
SIGNATURE-
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
--
Vapour Forge
Jake Anderson
Project Manager
Mobile:0412 897 125
Email:j...@vapourforge.com
Web
-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
--
Vapour Forge
Jake Anderson
Project Manager
Mobile:0412 897 125
Email:j...@vapourforge.com
Web Page:www.vapourforge.com
Your source
for custom IT services
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
Jorge Bastos wrote:
1-So for now I'm going to see a way to get this info from postfix,
whether grep the logs or something else.
2-the views are important, 'cause if the message was received by
postfix and not by dbmail, something eat it!
After wake up this morning I was thinking, the
Aaron Stone wrote:
We dropped the dbmail_config table very early on, between DBMail 1.1 and
1.2. There were good reasons to have a configuration file, and once things
started going in there, having two places to configure the daemons seemed
like a bad idea. One concern I remember was about the
ation is not a solution for me,
obviously :(
--
Vapour Forge
Jake Anderson
Project Manager
Mobile:0412 897 125
Email:j...@vapourforge.com
Web Page:www.vapourforge.com
Your source
for custom IT services
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail
Using the debs from nfgd.net
has anybody else noticed that its *really* slow using thunderbird to
download a large email, like 9mb or so. It seems to come in at around
6KB/sec (iftop reports a burst of 12K then 200 bytes or so, alternating
every second)
using squirrelmail I get it at around
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Jake Anderson wrote:
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Jake,
This is a known issue. Downloading large messages is just plain broken
in 2.3.5. I've already fixed this.
Cool thanks.
any idea of when a new lot of debs would be available?
Right after 2.3.6
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Jake Anderson wrote:
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Jake Anderson wrote:
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Jake,
This is a known issue. Downloading large messages is just plain broken
in 2.3.5. I've already fixed this.
Cool thanks.
any
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Jake Anderson wrote:
Any idea when the next version will be a release?
(2.3.5)
I've held off migrating my production system untill this system is
stable ish
Looks like that's pretty close now. (I'm just not a big fan of compiling
my own code)
2.3.5 is getting
Any idea when the next version will be a release?
(2.3.5)
I've held off migrating my production system untill this system is
stable ish
Looks like that's pretty close now. (I'm just not a big fan of compiling
my own code)
Paul J Stevens wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
That's *great* news
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following issue has been RESOLVED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=674
==
Reported By:
Is there anything in the mysql logs when that happens?
Jorge Bastos wrote:
Paul, using the GDB setup you said before:
---
Try gdb instead of valgrind:
gdb /usr/local/sbin/dbmail-imapd
gdb run -D
when it crashes
gdb bt
cut and paste the output and send me the result.
---
There's no stack,
I'm not a dev here but historically patches have been accepted favorably
when they help the core functions of dbmail.
I believe dbmail uses md5 hash as a password store because thats what
99% of mail clients can use.
Perhaps a patch for thunderbird too ;-
Daniel Bakken wrote:
Our company has
Daniel Bakken wrote:
I read in the change logs that SHA-1 and WHIRLPOOL hashes are
supported as of version 2.3.1. However, I can't get dbmail to
authenticate properly with those hash types. The dbmail-users program
still only supports md5.
MD5 is outdated and known to be insecure. How soon will
I'm migrating to a new server today.
Running 2.3.3 on debian lenny? (I'm an ubuntu man but all the deps
were out of date or unavailable urgh)
I' re-writing the mbox2dbmail tool so you can just let it loose in the
results of a dbmail-export of the whole system.
I'd rather use imapsync but that
Erik Osterman wrote:
First, thanks for taking an interest in this discussion. It wasn't my
intention to shape a whole new feature, if it hadn't been proposed
before. That said, I'd be delighted if it were to make its way into
the mainline.
Paul J Stevens wrote:
- make sure mailboxes are
Leander Koornneef wrote:
On 7/2/07 2:36 AM, Aaron Stone wrote:
On Sun, Jul 1, 2007, Jake Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
can we do anything about this?
The common thread appears to be including '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the To
header. Perhaps there's a filter that allows those
can we do anything about this?
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 23:03 +1000, Jake Anderson wrote:
Now that I've written all that, I am sure that should happen in the
database, in the replication code. It's just not likely to happen any
time soon :-\
Aaron
You mean that it should be taken care
Now that I've written all that, I am sure that should happen in the
database, in the replication code. It's just not likely to happen any
time soon :-\
Aaron
You mean that it should be taken care of by stored procedures and the
like? That sounds really quite hard ;-
I'd do it this way.
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
I think we should keep things encoded, because that's what clients
expect to receive. OTOH, encoded data cannot be searched.
I don't see how we can do both decoding and sha1 digests reliably at the
same time. Seems like asking for a *lot* of
Paul J Stevens wrote:
I think this discussion should move to dbmail-dev.
I've already finished most of the singleton mimechunk storage :-)
A bit raw around the edges, and only for sqlite atm. Stay tuned.
Fully backward compatible: just add two tables like I stated. Using sha1 over
the
something that might be handy is logging by domain. something like
apache with its vhosts. Such that i can farm off logs for a particular
domain to its admin.
How does this relate to the functionality of dbmail-export?
Aaron
ahh sorry i was reading about the logging thread and
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
Looks interesting.
As I just noted in bug #380, I think it would make a lot of sense for
dbmail-export to be able to delete the messages after export, and to
accept additional fine-grained message selection criteria.
Agreed.
I wonder
Paul J Stevens wrote:
I'm taking this to the dev list
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
This sounds scary to me. Obviously it's not my project and I'm not the
one coding, I'm just worried as an admin that depends on DBMail that we
are going to open up a large can of worms for dubious gain.
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Sat, 2006-12-09 at 18:46 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
paul - 09-Dec-06 18:46
--
I've been busy running valgrind, and I
how much do ya love me ;-
Awesome! In order to find out who's calling those g_reallocs that are
taking up so much space, I believe we need a large --depth. Could you
re-run your test, say with --depth=20?
i'll attempt also putting these in the bug track thingie
this is the
Jake Anderson wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Sat, 2006-12-09 at 18:46 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
paul - 09-Dec-06 18:46
--
I've been busy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=462
==
Reported By:fehuq
would it be possible to change the deps for libsieve and dbmail from
2.3.6-6 to 2.3.6 perhaps?
Its just ubuntu dapper (6.06) has 2.3.6-0ubuntu20 as its version and apt
doesn't like that.
perhaps an or? then the debian version will work with ubuntu as well.
I've run it with that version of the
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Jake Anderson wrote:
would it be possible to change the deps for libsieve and dbmail from
2.3.6-6 to 2.3.6 perhaps?
Jake,
What are you refering to here? There's no dbmail-2.3.6 and no libsieve-2.3.6
Ah, you must be refering
Aaron Stone wrote:
http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=multifoo_architecture
^
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 02:29 -0700, Aaron Stone wrote:
I want to draw some spare cycles in the backs of people's heads over to
a new page I just set up in the
A quick test by killing the middle process does not confirm this.
Instead, the middle process died, the parent process exited, and a child
process was left all by itself serving connections.
That ain't good, either!
I might try to fix this, but given that it happened because of a kill
I saw something once about a webmail direct from the DB product for
dbmail, but i can't find it again and from what i remember it was
unmaintained. I was thinking of hacking up something similar to squirrel
mail or perhaps as an addon for it to bypass the IMAP server and just
dive straight
36 matches
Mail list logo
