[Dbmail-dev] RE: [Dbmail] Testing

2008-05-24 Thread Jorge Bastos
mailinglist Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Testing Ah, that's what I get for *always* building --with-ldap Try again. And please Jorge: this belongs on the -dev list. Jorge Bastos wrote: > Hey Paul, > > > > Im just testing last svns to folowing the changes to be updated but: >

[Dbmail-dev] Hi!

2008-05-24 Thread Jorge Bastos
Testing ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

RE: [Dbmail-dev] RE: [Dbmail] Testing

2008-05-24 Thread Jorge Bastos
function `auth_get_users_from_clientid': /usr/local/lib/dbmail/libauth_sql.so: undefined symbol: auth_get_users_from_clientid --- Any ideia? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: sábado,

RE: [Dbmail-dev] RE: [Dbmail] Testing

2008-05-24 Thread Jorge Bastos
And those clients > unveil > and expose different problems. But so far just minor stuff like > regressions from the libzdb rewrite. Ones both clients are stable, > 2.3.3 > will be released. > > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > I noticed two things Paul, > > >

RE: [Dbmail-dev] RE: [Dbmail] Testing

2008-05-25 Thread Jorge Bastos
ROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens > Sent: domingo, 25 de Maio de 2008 16:26 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] RE: [Dbmail] Testing > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > > I'd like to test it with a domain in this test server. > > Plea

RE: [Dbmail-dev] RE: [Dbmail] Testing

2008-05-25 Thread Jorge Bastos
hines. Sometimes a changes on one machine is reverted by a mistake > on > another > > try again. > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Seams that im having no luck: > > > > May 25 16:43:15 flecha dbmail-lmtpd[8971]: [0x8772dc0] FATAL:[auth] > auth_load_driver(+10

RE: [Dbmail-dev] RE: [Dbmail] Testing

2008-05-25 Thread Jorge Bastos
o: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] RE: [Dbmail] Testing > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Perfect now! > > > > Hey, i belive i found something, on this test machine, I don't have > any users created yet, and check this: > > > > Nic

RE: [Dbmail-dev] RE: [Dbmail] Testing

2008-05-31 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, Just to tell you that so far, no complain about it. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: segunda-feira, 26 de Maio de 2008 21:51 > To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist' &

RE: [Dbmail-dev] RE: [Dbmail] Testing

2008-06-03 Thread Jorge Bastos
oose in the results of a dbmail-export of the whole system. I'd rather use imapsync but that requires knowing the users passwords and i've had problems with it in the past crashing etc. Jorge Bastos wrote: Paul, Just to tell you that so far, no complain about it.

RE: [Dbmail-dev] RE: [Dbmail] Testing

2008-06-03 Thread Jorge Bastos
to rewind a couple of revisions. > Before > 2.3.3 I've been trying to find a sweetspot in bufferevent handling that > may have introduced subtle timing problems. > > Like I said, I'm removing the higher level bufferevent api and falling > back to the base libevent api w

RE: [Dbmail-dev] RE: [Dbmail] Testing

2008-06-03 Thread Jorge Bastos
MAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: terça-feira, 3 de Junho de 2008 21:06 > To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist' > Subject: RE: [Dbmail-dev] RE: [Dbmail] Testing > > Bingo. > Disabling (this word exists?) IDLE did the trick. > So I guess it is affect

[Dbmail-dev] Failed to Store MimeParts

2008-06-04 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, Should i worry about this? Jun 4 22:16:26 lira dbmail/lmtpd[20198]: FATAL:[message] dbmail-message.c,dbmail_message_store(+1285): Failed to store mimeparts ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://twister.fastxs.net/mail

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Failed to Store MimeParts

2008-06-05 Thread Jorge Bastos
velopers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Failed to Store MimeParts > > Very much. Could it be your mysql settings for max_allowed_packet is > too small? > You should probably set it 125% higher than the maximum size of an > attachment > you wish to allow

[Dbmail-dev] rev 3035

2008-06-10 Thread Jorge Bastos
Ei Paul, In this rev you say in Changelog that fixed imapsearch.. --- 2008-06-09 Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * src/dbmail-mailbox.c: imap search fix --- But the update only updated the "ChangeLog" file: --- (R)eject, accept (t)emporarily or accept (p)ermanently? t U

RE: [Dbmail-dev] rev 3035

2008-06-10 Thread Jorge Bastos
ound the script that was causing these wanton reversions. > > > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Ei Paul, > > In this rev you say in Changelog that fixed imapsearch.. > > > > --- > > 2008-06-09 Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >

[Dbmail-dev] Question

2008-06-13 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, Is this problem fixed in the trunk code/2.3.3? http://dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=681 ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

[Dbmail-dev] Failed messages

2008-06-15 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I just discovered some messages in postfix queue that stay in a state "(lost connection with 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] while sending end of data -- message may be sent more than once)" If I force postfix to deliver them, they just stay in the same state. What can I get you to track this

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Failed messages

2008-06-16 Thread Jorge Bastos
> To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Failed messages > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > I just discovered some messages in postfix queue that stay in a state > > > > (lost connection with 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] while send

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Failed messages

2008-06-16 Thread Jorge Bastos
Ei, give me a hand here, is it possible to force only one message in the postfix queue? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: segunda-feira, 16 de Junho de 2008 22:25 > To: 'DBMAIL De

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Failed messages

2008-06-17 Thread Jorge Bastos
Saw this Paul? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: segunda-feira, 16 de Junho de 2008 23:00 > To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist' > Subject: RE: [Dbmail-dev] Failed messages

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Failed messages

2008-06-17 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hum ok, later tonight im going to enable logging in mysql and let you know. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens > Sent: terça-feira, 17 de Junho de 2008 12:43 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re:

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Failed messages

2008-06-17 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, No errors, mysql log attached. What's the next step? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens > Sent: terça-feira, 17 de Junho de 2008 12:43 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Fa

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Failed messages

2008-06-17 Thread Jorge Bastos
e 2008 21:28 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Failed messages > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Paul, > > No errors, mysql log attached. > > > > What's the next step? > > Pull the message from the queue, cat it into dbmail-

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Failed messages

2008-06-18 Thread Jorge Bastos
TECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: terça-feira, 17 de Junho de 2008 21:38 > To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist' > Subject: RE: [Dbmail-dev] Failed messages > > Hum, you have to help me with that. > I've been resendi

[Dbmail-dev] Can't get a connection from Pool

2008-07-05 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I have a situation where i can make DBMail end with a error. Jul 5 16:03:01 flecha dbmail/imap4d[26217]: [0x9b9f1c0] FATAL:[db] db_con_get(+234): can't get a database connection from the pool! This is due to what? The database didn't went down. What I was doing was to copy an ac

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Feature Request

2008-08-13 Thread Jorge Bastos
Can I make a question? ASAP stands for: as soon as possible And what about IIRC? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Stone > Sent: quarta-feira, 13 de Agosto de 2008 21:17 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Feature Request

2008-08-13 Thread Jorge Bastos
gt; IIRC = If I Remember Correctly :-) > > On Aug 13, 2008, at 1:21 PM, Jorge Bastos wrote: > > > Can I make a question? > > > > ASAP stands for: as soon as possible > > And what about IIRC? > > > > > > > >> -Original Message- > &

RE: [Dbmail-dev] IMAP append seq fault 11 problem with 2.3.x on FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE i386

2008-08-19 Thread Jorge Bastos
I have a similar problem, and i think it's the same issue. But my testing was using imapcopy, from one imap server to dbmail 2.3x version. Going to test and let you know. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Feally >

RE: [Dbmail-dev] IMAP append seq fault 11 problem with 2.3.x on FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE i386

2008-08-19 Thread Jorge Bastos
> > That would be an append then. What OS are you running on? And is > dbmail-imapd crashing with seg fault 11 or something else? > Linux, Well, not always... it's random on the segfault ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://twiste

[Dbmail-dev] Today's SVN

2008-09-10 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, Compiling today's SVN gives this: gcc -g -O2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/include/gmime-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -o .libs/dbmail-im

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Today's SVN

2008-09-10 Thread Jorge Bastos
#x27;s SVN > > Did you run 'autoreconf -i'? > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > > > Compiling today's SVN gives this: > > > > > > > > gcc -g -O2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include > >

[Dbmail-dev] last SVN

2008-10-05 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I was testing the last svn, and got this when loging to the pop3 server: telnet flecha 110 Trying 192.168.1.221... Connected to flecha. Escape character is '^]'. +OK DBMAIL pop3 server ready to rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> user a +OK Password required for a Connection closed by foreign host

RE: [Dbmail-dev] last SVN

2008-10-05 Thread Jorge Bastos
You're right Paul, I forgot to stop Imapd and it was the only one running the old revision. Sorry my mistake. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens > Sent: domingo, 5 de Outubro de 2008 15:33 > To: DBMAIL Develo

RE: [Dbmail-dev] last SVN

2008-10-05 Thread Jorge Bastos
Pop3d i mean > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: domingo, 5 de Outubro de 2008 16:26 > To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist' > Subject: RE: [Dbmail-dev] last SVN > > You

RE: [Dbmail-dev] last SVN

2008-10-05 Thread Jorge Bastos
t; Subject: RE: [Dbmail-dev] last SVN > > Jorge, please do let us know how it is working, along with the > selective logging options now available. See the new dist/dbmail.conf > on those new options and my last email to -dev. > > -Jon > > -Original Message- > F

RE: [Dbmail-dev] last SVN

2008-10-06 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hum ok Paul, That is better if I can go back if anything's wrong. That way I also can help in testing. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens > Sent: segunda-feira, 6 de Outubro de 2008 7:49 > To: DBMAIL Developer

RE: [Dbmail-dev] last SVN

2008-10-06 Thread Jorge Bastos
v- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: segunda-feira, 6 de Outubro de 2008 9:18 > To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist' > Subject: RE: [Dbmail-dev] last SVN > > Hum ok Paul, > That is better if I can go back if anything's wrong. > That way I also ca

[Dbmail-dev] SVN Build

2008-10-26 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi paul, Is the last svn able to run on a production environment? There's some problems on the 2.3.2 version with the patch you wrote (if you remember), that I'd like to change. ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://twister.fastxs

RE: [Dbmail-dev] SVN Build

2008-10-26 Thread Jorge Bastos
ly. Outlook > only cursory. Pop3d/timsieved/lmtpd havent been touched much since > 2.3.2 > and I don't expect any problems. > > In short HEAD is *very* much ready for live tests. No serious problems > remain at the moment. I'm going to release 2.3.4 later this week. >

RE: [Dbmail-dev] SVN Build

2008-10-26 Thread Jorge Bastos
>From the SVN HEAD, that is the tree for 2.3x development (2.4x) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Uwe Kiewel > Sent: domingo, 26 de Outubro de 2008 20:34 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] SVN

RE: [Dbmail-dev] SVN Build

2008-10-26 Thread Jorge Bastos
ESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jorge Bastos schrieb: > >>From the SVN HEAD, that is the tree for 2.3x development (2.4x) > > The same as svn checkout https://svn.ic-s.nl/svn/dbmail/trunk/dbmail > > Thanks, > Uwe > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Vers

RE: [Dbmail-dev] DBMail 2.3.4 released

2008-11-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, the link below for the changelog show's nothing. This has the lmtpd+imapd issue that I posted to you fixed? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens > Sent: sexta-feira, 14 de Novembro de 2008 13:48 > To: DBM

RE: [Dbmail-dev] DBMail 2.3.4 released

2008-11-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
Ah Paul, Imapd still dies. Tomorow i'll get you some info, log = 5 and gdb trace. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: sexta-feira, 14 de Novembro de 2008 23:10 > To: 'DBMA

RE: [Dbmail-dev] DBMail 2.3.4 released

2008-11-16 Thread Jorge Bastos
Niente From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jake Anderson Sent: sábado, 15 de Novembro de 2008 23:08 To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] DBMail 2.3.4 released Is there anything in the mysql logs when that happens? Jorge Bastos wrote

RE: [Dbmail-dev] DBMail 2.3.4 released

2008-11-16 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, I believe it's fixed this! Lmtpd it's ok now, but imapd still dies sometimes, could it be some look of the database too in imapd? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stevens > Sent: domingo, 16 de Novembro de 2008

RE: [Dbmail-dev] DBMail 2.3.4 released

2008-11-16 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, Check the attach gdb trace, I believe it will help you. It looks a bit different since the last fixes. Give me feedback if it helped you. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: do

RE: [Dbmail-dev] DBMail 2.3.4 released

2008-11-17 Thread Jorge Bastos
age.c' not uptodate. Cannot merge. lira:/usr/local/src/postfix/git/dbmail# > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: domingo, 16 de Novembro de 2008 22:19 > To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mail

RE: [Dbmail-dev] DBMail 2.3.4 released

2008-11-18 Thread Jorge Bastos
> > > > --- > > lira:/usr/local/src/postfix/git/dbmail# git pull > > Updating 95f29dc..1e6a5e7 > > src/dbmail-message.c: needs update > > error: Entry 'src/dbmail-message.c' not uptodate. Cannot merge. > > lira:/usr/local/src/postfix/git/dbmail# &g

RE: [Dbmail-dev] DBMail 2.3.4 released

2008-11-18 Thread Jorge Bastos
; Feel free to update. I fixed at least one crash. There is one database > change you need to apply. Check sql/mysql/2_3_4-2_3_5.mysql > > I'm busy using a much improved imaptest testsuite to work on imap > compliancy. This is causing quite a stirr: lots of changes coming. &g

[Dbmail-dev] last GIT on 23-11-2008

2008-11-23 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I was just testing last git, and have this: Why is it happening? I have: pid_directory = /var/run --- Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Sun Nov 23 12:32:41 2008 ... lira dbmail/lmtpd[29451]: [0x82ce990] EMERGENCY:[pidfile] pidfile_create(+113): Cannot open pidfile [/va

RE: [Dbmail-dev] last GIT on 23-11-2008

2008-11-23 Thread Jorge Bastos
GIT on 23-11-2008 > > > 2.3.3 and 2.3.4 didn't drop privileges. But I've re-added this again, > so > the pid_directory needs to be writable by the effective_user specified > in dbmail.conf. Also, if the pidfiles still exists you need to remove > them because they are probably

RE: [Dbmail-dev] last GIT on 23-11-2008

2008-11-23 Thread Jorge Bastos
Sent: domingo, 23 de Novembro de 2008 20:18 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] last GIT on 23-11-2008 > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > But still not on git right? > > check the change

RE: [Dbmail-dev] last GIT on 23-11-2008

2008-11-23 Thread Jorge Bastos
For making it work, i changed perms to 777 of /var and /var/run > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: domingo, 23 de Novembro de 2008 20:26 > To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist' &

RE: [Dbmail-dev] last GIT on 23-11-2008

2008-11-23 Thread Jorge Bastos
Sorry forgot to ask, isn't dbmail trying to write the pid file with the EFFECTIVE user in dbmail.conf? nobody in this case > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: domingo, 23 de Novembro d

RE: [Dbmail-dev] last GIT on 23-11-2008

2008-11-23 Thread Jorge Bastos
mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens > Sent: domingo, 23 de Novembro de 2008 20:46 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] last GIT on 23-11-2008 > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Sorry forgot to ask, isn't dbmail tryin

RE: [Dbmail-dev] last GIT on 23-11-2008

2008-11-23 Thread Jorge Bastos
> > Well, this query *was* changed recently: the recent_flag in the > sub-select was replaced by a '1', but I don't see anything wrong at > first glance. > > Is this always triggered by message insertions? (lmtp, dbmail-deliver, > imap append, imap copy) > > Lmtp

RE: [Dbmail-dev] last GIT on 23-11-2008

2008-11-24 Thread Jorge Bastos
> > Lmtp > > That doesn't answer my question at all. Does this always happen on > message insertion? Or, does mysql always crash reporting the same query > as causing the crash? Sounds like a mysql bug to me anyway. What > version > of mysql are you running? > Dificult question :) I believe that

[Dbmail-dev] Bug #720

2008-11-25 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I'd like to ask you if the bug in the subject, is fixed, so that the messages are deleted by the dbmail-util tool. Is it? Jorge, ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

[Dbmail-dev] Request for feature

2008-11-26 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul/Jonathan, I'd like to ask for a feature to be done. And since now there are two coders it may be possible. http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=log_conn http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=mail_trafic (with a table with the access's) http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwik

[Dbmail-dev] MySQL 5.1x GA

2008-11-27 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, Since the MySQL version starting from 5.1.30 is GA, when the Debian Repos have it available, is DBMail ready for it? Jorge ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

RE: [Dbmail-dev] MySQL 5.1x GA

2008-11-27 Thread Jorge Bastos
IL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] MySQL 5.1x GA > > > You tell me. I don't use it (yet). > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Paul, > > > > Since the MySQL version starting from 5.1.30 is GA, when the Debian > >

[Dbmail-dev] Last GIT

2008-12-01 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, Continuing to test last GIT, i still have the problem of the query that makes mysql crash. It may be a mysql bug, but are you sure there's nothing that can be tunned in the query that is making mysql to crash? Attached the mysql log. Dec 1 13:17:57 lira mysqld[10588]: Some

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT

2008-12-01 Thread Jorge Bastos
, service=0x805c503 "IMAP", servicename=0x805efa7 "dbmail-imapd") at server.c:758 #11 0x0805bf87 in main (argc=2, argv=Cannot access memory at address 0x48d3 ) at imapd.c:70 --- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos Sent: segunda-fei

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT

2008-12-01 Thread Jorge Bastos
at server.c:758 #8 0x0805bf87 in main (argc=2, argv=0x1c) at imapd.c:70 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos Sent: segunda-feira, 1 de Dezembro de 2008 15:10 To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist' Subject: RE: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT Mea

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT

2008-12-01 Thread Jorge Bastos
), but als search > for the first line that comes from dbmail code and do 'f ' > > > I've been slowly working my way through Timo's imaptest testcases, > fixing minor and not so minor problems with imap compliance. > > > > > > Jorge Bastos wrot

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT

2008-12-01 Thread Jorge Bastos
Sorry, didn't read the past at the end. I'll when it happens again. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: segunda-feira, 1 de Dezembro de 2008 16:00 > To: 'DBMAIL Develop

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT

2008-12-01 Thread Jorge Bastos
> > Sorry, didn't read the past at the end. > I'll when it happens again. > > Paul, got it: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb7541b00 (LWP 1648)] 0xb7ded167 in event_add () from /usr/lib/libevent-1.3e.so.1 (gdb) (gdb) (gdb) (gdb) (gdb) bt #0 0xb7ded1

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT

2008-12-01 Thread Jorge Bastos
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens > Sent: segunda-feira, 1 de Dezembro de 2008 16:29 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT > > > Jorge, > > could I get a Info level log for this crash

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT

2008-12-01 Thread Jorge Bastos
?? () #2 0x0008 in ?? () #3 0x in ?? () > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: segunda-feira, 1 de Dezembro de 2008 17:04 > To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist' > Subjec

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT

2008-12-01 Thread Jorge Bastos
I'm sorry, another one, but with the log level = 511 I've sent the log this for log level = 511 to your private email also. --- [Thread 0xb0d7eb90 (LWP 11228) exited] [New Thread 0xb0d7eb90 (LWP 11229)] Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. [Switching to Thread 0xb74a1b00 (LWP 10952)] 0xb7b2

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT

2008-12-01 Thread Jorge Bastos
Just one more Paul, What got me in attention was (in the end of the log): -- Dec 1 17:22:56 lira dbmail/imap4d[11325]: [0x8d80288] Debug:[clientbase] client_error_cb(+43): [0x8dc5ac8] 149583864 Bad file descriptor, 0x8dc5ac8 Dec 1 17:22:56 lira dbmail/imap4d[11325]: [0x8d80288] Debug:[imap] i

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT

2008-12-02 Thread Jorge Bastos
ro de 2008 9:11 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > > Dec 1 17:22:56 lira dbmail/imap4d[11325]: [0x8d80288] Notice:[imap] > > imap_cb_read(+281): empty read on possibly stale socket (still needed >

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT

2008-12-02 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, IMAPD now seams stable as a rock! Now there's only a pop3d, that I sent you with the logs. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: terça-feira, 2 de Dezembro de 2008 9:18 > To

RE: [Dbmail-dev] sqlrelay as alternative database interface for dbmail

2008-12-04 Thread Jorge Bastos
My opinion is that i think it's a good ideia, but after all this recoding for libzdb, it's complicated to do the same for sqlrelay. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Uwe Kiewel > Sent: quinta-feira, 4 de Dezembro de 2008 13

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Bug #737 & 738

2008-12-05 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, That's my issue also right? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stevens > Sent: sexta-feira, 5 de Dezembro de 2008 18:08 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Bug #737 & 738 > > Niki Guldb

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Bug #737 & 738

2008-12-05 Thread Jorge Bastos
ail-dev] Bug #737 & 738 > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Paul, > > That's my issue also right? > > Nope. > > -- > >Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl >NE

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Bug #737 & 738

2008-12-05 Thread Jorge Bastos
IL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Bug #737 & 738 > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Paul, > > That's my issue also right? > > Nope. > > -- > >Paul Stevens

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Bug #737 & 738

2008-12-06 Thread Jorge Bastos
t; Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Bug #737 & 738 > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Hum i saw on git "flush buffer on write event". > > Nothing related to my issue, right? > > Wrong again. That one should hopefully fix your issue with pop3d. > > > > > >

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Bug #737 & 738

2008-12-06 Thread Jorge Bastos
=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; --- My question is, if in the creation of the table there's an index for the seq column, in the partial script should exist also? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul J Steve

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Bug #737 & 738

2008-12-06 Thread Jorge Bastos
gt; Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Bug #737 & 738 > > correct. > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Paul, > > In the sql script "2_3_4-2_3_5.mysql" there's: > > > > --- > > alter table dbmail_mailboxes add seq bigint default 0 not null; > > alter t

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Bug #737 & 738

2008-12-06 Thread Jorge Bastos
& 738 > > correct. > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Paul, > > In the sql script "2_3_4-2_3_5.mysql" there's: > > > > --- > > alter table dbmail_mailboxes add seq bigint default 0 not null; > > alter table dbmail_mailboxes dr

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Bug #737 & 738

2008-12-06 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, You have missed the index, something's wrong: +ALTER TABLE dbmail_mailboxes ADD KEY seq (mtime); > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: sábado, 6 de Dezembro de 2008 15:42 > To

RE: [Dbmail-dev] Bug #737 & 738

2008-12-06 Thread Jorge Bastos
gt; [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens > Sent: sábado, 6 de Dezembro de 2008 19:57 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Bug #737 & 738 > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Paul, > > You have missed the index, something's wro

[Dbmail-dev] opening tmpfile failed: Too many open files

2008-12-09 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, Seams that there's still a leak in the "open files" part. This is what I saw in the logs, and it just stoped responding. -- Dec 9 17:13:26 lira dbmail/imap4d[12907]: [0x82a22a8] Error:[server] server_sock_cb(+431): Too many open files Dec 9 17:13:57 lira dbmail/imap4d[12907]: [0x

RE: [Dbmail-dev] opening tmpfile failed: Too many open files

2008-12-09 Thread Jorge Bastos
On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens > Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Dezembro de 2008 21:57 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] opening tmpfile failed: Too many open files > > > I havent been able to reproduce this :-(. You *are* running an > up-to-date revision,

RE: [Dbmail-dev] opening tmpfile failed: Too many open files

2008-12-09 Thread Jorge Bastos
3 if (D->cb_leave) D->cb_leave(data); (gdb) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Dezembro de 2008 22:03 > To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mai

[Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem

2008-12-10 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, There's something with sieve also. The problem Is that it doesn't show nothing. Can you tell me how can I login in the timsieved, and execute the commands to retrieve the script? Just to test. Using the Squirrelmail avelsieve plugin, the plugin just complains about this (works ok with

RE: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem

2008-12-10 Thread Jorge Bastos
] On Behalf Of Aleksander Kamenik > Sent: quarta-feira, 10 de Dezembro de 2008 22:50 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > > *Fatal error*: Allowed memory size of 134217728 bytes exhausted > (tried >

RE: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem

2008-12-11 Thread Jorge Bastos
ubject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Yes, but it's not php related! > > It is trying to obtain data and it seems to loop with git head. > > With previous versions work, so sieve git head problem. > > > > Paul, need

RE: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem

2008-12-11 Thread Jorge Bastos
: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem > > > it's there already. > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Thank me Paul :P > > > > I'll look for the upload on the web git. > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: [EMAIL PRO

RE: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem

2008-12-11 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul sorry, Still not working, same problem. Can you tell me the commands to login/retrieve the script? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: quinta-feira, 11 de Dezembro de 2008 9:43 &

RE: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem

2008-12-11 Thread Jorge Bastos
embro de 2008 13:49 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Paul sorry, > > Still not working, same problem. > > Can you tell me the commands to login/retrieve

RE: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem

2008-12-11 Thread Jorge Bastos
v- > boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: quinta-feira, 11 de Dezembro de 2008 14:48 > To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist' > Subject: RE: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem > > Checking, > How do i generate this password? > -- > AUTHENTICATE &quo

RE: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem

2008-12-11 Thread Jorge Bastos
mail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem > > It's a SASL string, so you have to generate a base64 from the > concatenation of: nul username nul password > > Try this: > perl -MMIME::Base64 -e \ > 'print encode_base64("\x00username\x00password");' >

RE: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem

2008-12-11 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, Check this, after logged in into sieve, it just closes the connection: Attached you have a log 511 for sieve. --- flecha:~# telnet 192.168.1.222 2000 Trying 192.168.1.222... Connected to 192.168.1.222. Escape character is '^]'. "IMPLEMENTATION" "DBMail timsieved 2.3.4" "SASL" "PLAIN" "SIE

RE: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem

2008-12-12 Thread Jorge Bastos
ailto:dbmail-dev- > boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens > Sent: sexta-feira, 12 de Dezembro de 2008 8:42 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem > > > Jorge, > > plz update and try again, and send me the same l

RE: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem

2008-12-12 Thread Jorge Bastos
sexta-feira, 12 de Dezembro de 2008 14:42 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] GIT HEAD sieve problem > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Hum, I may be wrong but I don't see anything new in the logs. > > I do: > > Dec 12 11:46:34 lira dbmail/ti

RE: [Dbmail-dev] opening tmpfile failed: Too many open files

2008-12-13 Thread Jorge Bastos
many open files -- Forgot to put dbmail-imapd running under gdb :( Running now. > -Original Message- > From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev- > boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos > Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Dezembro de 2008 22:03 > To: &#x

RE: [Dbmail-dev] opening tmpfile failed: Too many open files

2008-12-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
Sent: domingo, 14 de Dezembro de 2008 5:28 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] opening tmpfile failed: Too many open files > > How many concurrent connections do you have when this happens? Perhaps > you are having a DOS attack? > > -Jon > &g

RE: [Dbmail-dev] opening tmpfile failed: Too many open files

2008-12-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
sucker. The tmp file was closed only on session > destruction. Now, I've changed things so it's closed on message > destruction. Gmime voodoo. > > > > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > Negative Jon, > > No DOS attack! I'm 100% sure of it as I've been monitori

  1   2   3   4   5   >