[Dbmail-dev] TimsieveD stack trace

2014-11-16 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I've created a bug report with the stack trace for timsieved that gets zombie every 2/3 days with too much open files issue, in: http://dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=1062 Other question is, now when a new bug report is created or updated, the -dev list is not receiving it, just to

[Dbmail-dev] POP3D and LMTPD debug

2014-11-08 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I believe i found the reason for LMTPD and POP3D to crash/gets zombie in 3.1.17. Check this #bug: http://dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=1063 This was with LMTPD, but I believe it's the same for POP3D. ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list

[Dbmail-dev] POP3D SIGKILL

2014-11-06 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I'm loving 3.1.17, IMAPD is stable, in two days it's consuming 1.2GB of RAM, LMTPD stable (my error was using too much instances, my fault), but so far working great, just a few aparts that i'll take care in time like the dbmail-util, I'm using monit to take care of any problem

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Suggestion for dbmail-util, message counter

2014-02-27 Thread Jorge Bastos
Jorge, This is not the first time you suggest this, but I just don't see the need. Rebuilding the cache is a one-time operation, not something to be done regularly. So why would you *need* this? As opposed to *want*. On 26-02-14 22:56, Jorge Bastos wrote: Hi Paul, I'd like

[Dbmail-dev] Suggestion for dbmail-util, message counter

2014-02-26 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I'd like to suggest if possible of course, to have the counter for cache rebuild like: 10.04 % of 100.00% done or X of Y messages done Instead of the dots for the cache rebuild. This would give anyone who needs to perform this operation the exact remaining amount of

[Dbmail-dev] Debug per Source IP

2013-09-13 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I've been reading all the emails with debugs etc etc of the new version and something came to mind, how about having an option in dbmail.conf to debug per source IP addrr? Like postfix has it's feature with the debug_peer_list that does what I'm describing. Don't know how much

[Dbmail-dev] (Possible) new feature, mailbox status code when full

2013-09-01 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, This is just an idea for a feature, I think of it with some interest, don't know your opinion. What do you thing about, having a configuration in dbmail.conf for the code returned when mailbox is full, so that another status code it returned for full mailboxes, so that postfix

Re: [Dbmail-dev] (Possible) new feature, mailbox status code when full

2013-09-01 Thread Jorge Bastos
This is already supported. [DELIVERY] # # Soft or hard bounce on over-quota delivery # quota_failure = hard set it to 'soft' so the MTA will queue the message and try delivering again later. Ah nice then, I'm still on a version around 2.3.6 year 2008/2009. Do you have in mind

[Dbmail-dev] Compiler Warnings

2013-08-30 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, Since you're taking care of compiler warnings, here's a few more, from GCC-4.8 --- authsql.c: In function 'auth_change_password': authsql.c:263:80: warning: argument 'enctype' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork' [-Wclobbered] int auth_change_password(uint64_t

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Customized header in dbmail.conf

2013-08-26 Thread Jorge Bastos
X-mycompanyname-Email: MS Exchange v99.78 version for year 2059 Is not going to happen in lmtpd since we would need the sieve 'editheader' extension (rfc5293). If you really need this, you will have to use dbmail-delivery+procmail. I prefer the sieve part, but for what you say it's that

[Dbmail-dev] Customized header in dbmail.conf

2013-08-25 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, How could it be possible, to have an option in dbmail.conf to add a customized header to incoming emails? Idea is to add something like: X-mycompanyname-Email: MS Exchange v99.78 version for year 2059 J Jorge, ___ Dbmail-dev

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Sieve vacation and extra size subject's

2013-08-11 Thread Jorge Bastos
I just noticed something, that even that it's not completely correct (the size of), when I send an email to a user that has a sieve vacation with an huge size on the subject, it fails, the reply doesn't happen. Afaict, this happens all in libsieve, not in dbmail itself. Reading the

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Sieve vacation and extra size subject's

2013-08-11 Thread Jorge Bastos
Jorge, I've tested this with libsieve 2.2.9 and it works as expected: subject is truncated. Please test this yourself with SIEVE_DEBUG=yes in dbmail.conf Just did, and now it works, gr Oh well, I'll note this to test when I upgrade to 3.1.2 or 3.2x

[Dbmail-dev] Sieve vacation and extra size subject's

2013-08-10 Thread Jorge Bastos
: require [vacation]; # rule:[] if true { vacation :days 1 :addresses tr...@domain.pt reply message to the user; } From: Jorge Bastos jo...@domain.pt To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?'Ant=F3nio_Almeida'?= alme...@domain.pt, 'Paulo Silva' paulo.si...@domain.pt Subject: http

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Email construction

2013-06-13 Thread Jorge Bastos
On 06/13/2013 12:34 AM, Jorge Bastos wrote: I have no idea why there's an HTML entity instead of the real char, but that's something the person's emails client decided to insert. It's not a valid header. What do you expect? What client does this? Well have no idea, there's no headers

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Email construction

2013-06-13 Thread Jorge Bastos
I'm sorry Jorge, but that really doesn't look like a raw message. How did you obtain it? I'm sure it's possible in Outlook to get the message source, without translated headers. It's strange, i think we should forget this matter, I only saw the raw msg a few mins ago, have no ideia how that

[Dbmail-dev] Email construction

2013-06-12 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, Is it possible for you to test in the last version, if an email with the info on the buttom on the From: header fails in last version? In the version I have it fails. (cannot upgrade to just test this right now) I have no idea why there's an HTML entity instead of the real char,

Re: [Dbmail-dev] 3.1.0 pre-announcement Re: [SCM]Paul's DBMail tree branch, master, updated. ea836fd3c418cdc6b87123aea3f2a2fda5f60de7

2013-05-31 Thread Jorge Bastos
On production? That's stupid. Brave, but stupid. You know better. Go for 3.0.2 first. It's quite stable. Or wait for 3.0.3 which is imminent. Well... I may follow your advice for 3.0.3! ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org

Re: [Dbmail-dev] 3.1.0 pre-announcement Re: [SCM]Paul's DBMail tree branch, master, updated. ea836fd3c418cdc6b87123aea3f2a2fda5f60de7

2013-05-29 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I'd like to test this (less MEMPOOL) on production sinse I have to make an upgrade to my installation that already should had been done about in 2010. -Original Message- From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev- boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Done memory leaks

2013-03-01 Thread Jorge Bastos
You know I always did testing, just haven't done it due to lack of time. Jorge, Don't test git-master on your production server. That is *not* what I meant. Paul, I won't do that :) Will test with released versions only, git only if needed,

[Dbmail-dev] Done memory leaks (was: RE: [SCM]Paul's DBMail tree branch, master, updated. 1f43e8926da69409ce5e4b22a44cf0f9ec9268ff)

2013-02-28 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, Allow me to ask, with this job, you the remaining memory leaks were killed? Jorge, -Original Message- From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev- boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens Sent: quinta-feira, 28 de Fevereiro de 2013 11:46 To:

[Dbmail-dev] Feature Request, dbmail-util counter

2012-09-16 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy Paul, I'd like to, suggest a change if possible of course. Could dbmail-util, for example for dbmail-util -by, could it have output display instead of the actual dots , something like: 1 of 99, 2 of 999, something like that? If you remember, WGET in the past used to show

[Dbmail-dev] dbmail-imapd at 100% cpu

2012-08-24 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I have a machine, non-production, that has a dbmail installed, almost just for compilation tests. I just loged in the machine and saw that imapd is at 100% cpu on that thread, strace -p ' pid ' shows the below info: Is there anything that you want me to do? epoll_wait(9,

[Dbmail-dev] Typo on Gmime 2.4 and 2.6 detection

2012-05-26 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy Paul, There's a typo in yout last change to allow gmime 2.4 and 2.6 auto detection: http://git.dbmail.eu/paul/dbmail/commit/?id=dec4b9c075876c02c76235ffd2adeeaa 6b400ea7 + ac_gmime_cflags=`${gmimeconfig} --cflags gmime-2.6 2 || ${gmimeconfig} --cflags gmime-2.4` There an

[Dbmail-dev] Feature Request, dbmail-util counter

2012-03-16 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy Paul, I'd like to, suggest a change if possible of course. Could dbmail-util, for example for dbmail-util -by, could it have output display instead of the actual dots , something like: 1 of 99, 2 of 999, something like that? This way it'll give us a better perspective on

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Testing 3.0.2

2012-03-12 Thread Jorge Bastos
Jorge, Nothing to worry about. Only the warning in dbmail-message.c deserves attention. I'll look into it. Fall out from the oracle patch which needs cleaning up. Thanks Paul, ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org

[Dbmail-dev] Testing 3.0.2

2012-03-11 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy Paul, Was testing your recent 3.0.2, and saw some warnings that I don't know how far they can bad, there's also some warnings that are harmless. I could do a patch to remove the unused variables but I think it's better you to decide which are to remove or not. Gcc 4.6.3.

Re: [Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000961]: Sieve response is incorrect

2012-02-27 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, Thanks for the fix. Allow me two questions, The debian package is in: deb http://debian.nfgd.net/debian stable main right? If yes still not available, it's only available 2.2.6-1.1. The package that you uploaded is from 2.2.8-rc1 and beyond right? I ask this 'cause of another fix I

Re: [Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000961]: Sieve response is incorrect

2012-02-27 Thread Jorge Bastos
http://debian.nfgd.net/debian/dists/oneiric/ Pickup the source if you need it: http://debian.nfgd.net/debian/dists/oneiric/main/source/libs/ The package that you uploaded is from 2.2.8-rc1 and beyond right? I ask this 'cause of another fix I discovered some time ago. Correct,

[Dbmail-dev] Sieve port, 2000 or new 4190

2012-02-26 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, Something that you already know for sure, and I just want to make DBMail as best as possible. Sieve port was moved from 2000 to 4190, I don't know if this has any server behavior changes, but if it's only the port, DBMail could start using the new port also, and if anyone need to use

[Dbmail-dev] DBMail v3.0 / Gmime

2012-02-17 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, About Gmime, I've tested compile it agains gmime 2.6 (changing the lines in the configure script) and it compiled without problems. My question is, any problem/incompatibility with it, or should I stick with the latest 2.4? Jorge, ___

Re: [Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000897]: dbmail-util creates duplicate entries in dbmail_envelope

2012-02-15 Thread Jorge Bastos
Can I have lmtp+pop3 up with activity, and only IMAP down while I'm recreating the cache? Yes. But don't use the procedure Frank Röske proposed if you keep LMTP running. Just use the upgrade script in GIT (to be in 3.0.1) Hum Paul, I want be sure about this. On my case, on the git

Re: [Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000897]: dbmail-util creates duplicate entries in dbmail_envelope

2012-02-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
Do a 'truncated table dbmail_envelope' and add the above index right away. Then run dbmail-util -by to recreate the cached envelopes. This will only affect IMAP users. Hum, If that's the only way it'll be. I do have several IMAP users, about 50% of them.

[Dbmail-dev] LibZDB

2012-02-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, Is it possible to pack the LibZDB 2.10 version in debian package in your repo? Jorge, ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

Re: [Dbmail-dev] LibZDB

2012-02-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
Is it possible to pack the LibZDB 2.10 version in debian package in your repo? Why? No new features. Only C++ compatibility. I track SVN changes and saw some code improvements, maybe they would be benefic. But you know better the code than me if that's important the update, if not I trunk

Re: [Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000897]: dbmail-util creates duplicate entries in dbmail_envelope

2012-02-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
If that's the only way it'll be. I do have several IMAP users, about 50% of them. They probably won't notice if you time it right. I understand, I'll do it on a Saturday/Sunday morning or so. This time I'll do a parallel test before doing it on the main server, I'll boot one of the disks

Re: [Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000897]: dbmail-util creates duplicate entries in dbmail_envelope

2012-02-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
If that's the only way it'll be. I do have several IMAP users, about 50% of them. They probably won't notice if you time it right. I understand, I'll do it on a Saturday/Sunday morning or so. This time I'll do a parallel test before doing it on the main server, I'll boot one of

Re: [Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000897]: dbmail-util creates duplicate entries in dbmail_envelope

2012-02-13 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, This bug may explain why I can't apply the: CREATE UNIQUE INDEX dbmail_envelope_1 ON dbmail_envelope(physmessage_id); Of the file: 2_3_6-3_0_0.mysql What do you recommend to search delete the duplicated info, without recreate the cache? I'm with 110GB right now, and if I can bypass the

[Dbmail-dev] Possible decoding problem on headers with iso-8859-1

2012-01-17 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy Paul, Here's a possible problem with decoding of headers in latin1 (iso-8859-1). Please check this: http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1488307#comment:1 attached there's the raw message and the imap debug from roundcube. Could it be a bug? [17-Jan-2012 11:52:08

[Dbmail-dev] Help on Mailman/example config

2011-12-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy people, I need some help on some examples on configuring mailman with dbmail, and don't know where to start. Does anyone can give me some lights on it? Thanks, Jorge, ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Help on Mailman/example config

2011-12-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
My error sorry. The idea was to send only to users ML. -Original Message- From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev- boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens Sent: quarta-feira, 14 de Dezembro de 2011 17:43 To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist Subject: Re:

[Dbmail-dev] IMAP crash on search

2011-10-12 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I found something that I don't know if it's already fixed. --- [/var/log] # telnet 192.168.1.222 143 * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=CRAM-MD5 ID] Decimal Informatica e Gestao, LDA - IMAPD Server * BYE dbmail IMAP4 server signing off due to timeout Connection closed

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT

2011-09-28 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, What bugs? -- Verzonden van mijn An droid telefoon met K-9 Mail. Jorge, please do your homework. I need ticket numbers from the tracker. Thnx -- One is something that I balieve it can be this one: http://dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=851

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT

2011-09-27 Thread Jorge Bastos
Some arround gmime, From some time ago, maybe year or more. From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens Sent: terça-feira, 27 de Setembro de 2011 7:01 To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Last GIT Jorge

[Dbmail-dev] Last GIT

2011-09-26 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy Paul, Sorry for the question again, but on the last changed on GIT, how do you consider the last stable for production? There's some bugfix's that I need. Jorge ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org

[Dbmail-dev] Line lenght

2011-09-19 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy Paul, Let me ask about something that I don't know if it's tunable . I got back from vacation today, and I had about 15.000 spam emails that were not detected by SpamAssassin on that time, lucky for me, the almost 15.000 had the some sender name/email. I deleted all of them, but then

[Dbmail-dev] libtool problem

2011-08-18 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I have a problem that I don't know which side is, libtool or dbmail. I'm trying to compile on my test machine the 3.0-RC3, but I get a weird error: libtool: link: (cd .libs rm -f libdbmail.so.0 ln -s libdbmail.so.0.0.0 libdbmail.so.0) libtool: link: (cd .libs rm -f libdbmail.so

[Dbmail-dev] Libtool problem

2011-08-18 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I have a problem that I don't know which side is, libtool or dbmail. I'm trying to compile on my test machine the 3.0-RC3, but I get a weird error: libtool: link: (cd .libs rm -f libdbmail.so.0 ln -s libdbmail.so.0.0.0 libdbmail.so.0) libtool: link: (cd .libs rm -f

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Libtool problem

2011-08-18 Thread Jorge Bastos
: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos Sent: quinta-feira, 18 de Agosto de 2011 11:14 To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist' Subject: [Dbmail-dev] Libtool problem Hi Paul, I have a problem that I don't know which side is, libtool or dbmail

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Libtool problem

2011-08-18 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, libtool: link: (cd .libs rm -f libdbmail.so.0 ln -s libdbmail.so.0.0.0 libdbmail.so.0) libtool: link: (cd .libs rm -f libdbmail.so ln -s libdbmail.so.0.0.0 libdbmail.so) /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.la: No such file or directory Re-generate configure

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Libtool problem

2011-08-18 Thread Jorge Bastos
Ah wait. The mysql libtool archive comes from libzdb. Use the debs at debian.nfgd.net I build amd64 packages for libsieve, libzdb and dbmail for debian/squeeze (stable, debian/sid (unstable), ubuntu/lucid (lts) and ubuntu/natty (current). I'm on x86 :( I'm a bit confused, this

[Dbmail-dev] Extra DOT in HTTP links

2011-07-13 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy, Paul, I have a wierd thing here that I'd like your precious help. Sometimes, when people send a link, on HTML emails, the recipient get's the link with an extra DOT. It becames this way: http://site.pt/blabla.zip the mask is OK, but if we put the mouse on top of the

[Dbmail-dev] FW: [DBMail 0000881]: [ not allowed in string atom

2011-07-07 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy, Paul, Sorry to bring this to the -dev mailing list. So, this means that the [ char cannot be used in password's? I ask this, 'cause if it's true, to fix a software I have to manage users accounts/change password's. -Original Message- From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org

Re: [Dbmail-dev] FW: [DBMail 0000881]: [ not allowed in string atom

2011-07-07 Thread Jorge Bastos
It only works if the password containing any of []() is quoted by the imap client or if the client uses AUTHENTICATE LOGIN instead of LOGIN - since AUTHENTICATE LOGIN encodes the username and password in base64. So: it is only a problem if the client sends unquoted login credentials.

[Dbmail-dev] POP3D zombie

2011-06-15 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy Paul, Don't know if you remember me talking about POP3D becoming zombie, it happened again. lira:/var/log# strace -p 14654 Process 14654 attached - interrupt to quit clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, {950704, 552207218}) = 0 epoll_wait(9, unfinished ... +++ killed by SIGKILL +++

[Dbmail-dev] dbmail_aliases question

2011-05-08 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy, I was checking the dbmail_aliases table, and my sctruture is: +-+--+--+-+-++ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +-+--+--+-+-++ |

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail_aliases question

2011-05-08 Thread Jorge Bastos
to do store and forwards, i.e. store in mailbox and also redirect to elsewhere d...@dave.com 11 d...@dave.com b...@gmail.com Kind Regards James Greig From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos Sent: 08 May 2011 18:54

[Dbmail-dev] GIT

2011-03-24 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I saw that you now have both git.dbmail.eu and the repo on github. Which one should we follow? Jorge, ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

[Dbmail-dev] Fancy tool for current status

2011-02-13 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy Paul, Today I woke up and was thinking on one tool that could give me the current status of POP3D and IMAPD and also LMTPD. The idea is to see in the moment, who's downloading data from POP3D or IMAPD. There's yet no tool to see this, is it? Like a Linux top Jorge,

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Fancy tool for current status

2011-02-13 Thread Jorge Bastos
Anderson Sent: domingo, 13 de Fevereiro de 2011 13:02 To: dbmail-dev@dbmail.org Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Fancy tool for current status On 13/02/11 23:43, Jorge Bastos wrote: Howdy Paul, Today I woke up and was thinking on one tool that could give me the current status of POP3D and IMAPD

[Dbmail-dev] Killing warnings

2011-01-24 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy Paul, Saw that you killed some warnings in last GIT, and if you want to kill some more here you have them: flecha:/usr/local/src/postfix/git/dbmail# gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i486-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 4.4.5-4'

Re: [Dbmail-dev] (Oracle support) RE: [SCM]Paul's DBMail tree branch, master, updated. d064eb77fdd459a6b2ce1db5e90d8e69ad8a299a

2011-01-15 Thread Jorge Bastos
At this point, is it possible for you to upload the LibZDB 2.7 do the debian repo? I can, but *not* with oracle support since oracle isn't there in debian. Please do it Paul when possible for you. Let us know when it's done (even without oracle support). Jorge,

[Dbmail-dev] (Oracle support) RE: [SCM]Paul's DBMail tree branch, master, updated. d064eb77fdd459a6b2ce1db5e90d8e69ad8a299a

2011-01-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy Paul, Thanks for the Oracle support. At this point, is it possible for you to upload the LibZDB 2.7 do the debian repo? Jorge, add oracle support ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org

[Dbmail-dev] Delete email older than X date

2010-10-31 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy Paul / others, I'm trying to achieve one thing that is: Delete email on INBOX only, emails older than a specified date, example: .. Delete emails on INBOX older than 31-07-2010 How could this be done? I have no idea. Thanks, Jorge,

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Delete email older than X date

2010-10-31 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, You can't do this in one query (at least not on mysql). You'll need to fetch a list of message_idnr to delete (1) and then delete the messages (2). 1) select message_idnr from dbmail_messages m join dbmail_physmessage p on m.physmessage_id=p.id join dbmail_mailboxes b on

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Delete email older than X date

2010-10-31 Thread Jorge Bastos
I'm testing dbmail-export, I think I'll go for that solution, what do you say? It's better than messing with the database, no? Depends on what you need. I can't read your mind. If your not comfortable writing sql and scripts, use dbmail-export. I'm testing the SQL query aswell... well

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Delete email older than X date

2010-10-31 Thread Jorge Bastos
Depends on what you need. I can't read your mind. If your not comfortable writing sql and scripts, use dbmail-export. I'm testing the SQL query aswell... well both may work for me. Going to test them! Paul one thing I forgot to ask in the previous email: After deleting the records on

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Delete email older than X date

2010-10-31 Thread Jorge Bastos
In that case, do not delete the messages but set their status to 2, just like when you delete a message using POP3. That way dbmail-util will take care of the actual deletions. That will take two separate dbmail-util runs, so you can check for problems in between. Just to finish, just two

[Dbmail-dev] FW: [openchange][devel] OpenChange SOGo server first achievement

2010-10-20 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul and others, The below SOGo software, would be great to have it DBMail. How could this ever work? I still didn’t searched if SOGo has IMAP, but have this using the DBMail auth, and use the OpenChange featured of address book and calendar, would be awesome. -Original

Re: [Dbmail-dev] LibZDB debian package for testing

2010-10-09 Thread Jorge Bastos
- boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos Sent: quarta-feira, 29 de Setembro de 2010 21:34 To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist' Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] LibZDB debian package for testing MySQL only, I haven't seen any changes to the MySQL driver in ZDB but, I'd like to have it working

[Dbmail-dev] LibZDB debian package for testing

2010-09-29 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, Is it possible to pack the last 2.7 LibZDB to Debian package so that I can use it on my testing server? Jorge, ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

Re: [Dbmail-dev] LibZDB debian package for testing

2010-09-29 Thread Jorge Bastos
...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Paul J Stevens Sent: quarta-feira, 29 de Setembro de 2010 21:26 To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] LibZDB debian package for testing No problem, but why the rush. Do you use psql or sqlite? -- Paul J Stevens / p...@nfg.nl Jorge Bastos

[Dbmail-dev] MySQL 5.5, anyone?

2010-09-21 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy people, I'd like to know if there's anyone in MySQL 5.5 (now RC). I'd like to plan my upgrade of DBMail with MySQL 5.5 on new hardware. If anyone or Paul has feedback about this, please send some feedback, Thanks, Jorge, ___

Re: [Dbmail-dev] MySQL 5.5, anyone?

2010-09-21 Thread Jorge Bastos
. We won’t be moving away from stable 5.0 from a long time.. Kind Regards James Greig From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos Sent: 21 September 2010 16:47 To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist' Subject: [Dbmail-dev] MySQL 5.5

Re: [Dbmail-dev] MySQL 5.5, anyone?

2010-09-21 Thread Jorge Bastos
Of Jorge Bastos Sent: 21 September 2010 18:13 To: 'DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist' Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] MySQL 5.5, anyone? Hi James, Well... that leaves me with one foot behind. Right now I’m on 5.0 also, with file_per_table configured for InnoDB, and with a small P4 3.0 with HT

Re: [Dbmail-dev] MySQL 5.5, anyone?

2010-09-21 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Renne, 32-bit-systems can't handle more than 3,2 GB of RAM. As workaround you can use a PAE-enabled Linux-kernel (performance-impact because of additional memory-mapping) or switch to 64-bit OS if your CPU supports EMT64 (starting somewhere around the P4/500 series). I know that...

Re: [Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000859]: Login rejection based on a defined message

2010-09-08 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Jesse, As far as I know, there's no standard/supported way to do this. When I enter my password to check my email, if the login fails for any reason (eg. I entered the wrong password, or my fancy new status field has value 100), all I see is another message prompting me for the

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Thunderbird tags

2010-08-17 Thread Jorge Bastos
2.3.x supports this just fine. I really need to make some time to release 2.3.7 :-( Hi Paul, Take some vacation 1st :) ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

[Dbmail-dev] Info about GIT HEAD

2010-06-19 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy people, I'd like to know if anyone is using GIT HEAD, and how stable it is and which problems do you have if any. Also, which clients, TB+MSO or MSOE Thanks, Jorge, ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Info about GIT HEAD

2010-06-19 Thread Jorge Bastos
, not of dbmail? Haven't had an oppty lately to do much testing on dbmail itself.) Lou Picciano - Original Message - From: Jorge Bastos mysql.jo...@decimal.pt To: dbmail-dev@dbmail.org Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 6:41:33 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [Dbmail-dev] Info

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Info about GIT HEAD

2010-06-19 Thread Jorge Bastos
severe concurrency pressure ( 10 concurrent clients accessing the same mailbox). Also, imaptest (ref: dovecot) has uncovered some problems with imap search that are not fatal, but I'd like to resolve before 2.4.0. On 06/19/2010 06:39 PM, Jorge Bastos wrote: Hi Lou, I’m

[Dbmail-dev] POP3d Zombie

2010-06-04 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, Remember I reported something about POP3D that became zombie? It just happened now, but I only got this: lira:~# strace -p 19559 Process 19559 attached - interrupt to quit clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, {2922415, 777168104}) = 0 epoll_wait(10, ^C unfinished ... Process 19559

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Request for fix

2010-06-01 Thread Jorge Bastos
I can't reproduce this. What dbmail and libsieve versions are you using? Sorry for the delay, I was out on a MUSE concert :-) That's last stable libsieve (without your last patch) DBMail git on: commit 42b0e5a40fadb7c6899b3bd2ec8b17d4ce57b774 Author: Paul J Stevens p...@nfg.nl Date: Sat

[Dbmail-dev] Request for fix

2010-05-26 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy Paul, I'd like to ask you one thing. We're approaching the vacation time, and the only time (the most) where the vacation feature is used. I'd like to ask you if it's possible for you, since you fixed bug: http://dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=844 Could you also fix the bug:

[Dbmail-dev] Oracle Support on LibZDB

2010-05-25 Thread Jorge Bastos
Howdy Paul, LibZDB just added support for Oracle. Could we have this being supported on DBMail aswell? Jorge, ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Moving to GIT HEAD

2010-05-03 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, Sorry to re-ask, but since you didn't said nothing, and meanwhile responded to other stuff in dbmail@, not urgent but 'd like to solve it. Jorge, From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de Abril de

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Moving to GIT HEAD

2010-05-03 Thread Jorge Bastos
mysql CREATE UNIQUE INDEX dbmail_envelope_1 ON dbmail_envelope(physmessage_id); ERROR 1062 (23000): Duplicate entry '294904' for key 3 I'd clean out the oldest one. Going to do it! Other thing is, after using the last GIT HEAD, POP3 doesn’t work, check this: +OK

[Dbmail-dev] Moving to GIT HEAD

2010-04-30 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, Two things, when moving to the GIT HEAD: Adding the UNIQUE key to the envelope table, I have a duplicated record, how can I fix this in a safe way? -- mysql CREATE UNIQUE INDEX dbmail_envelope_1 ON dbmail_envelope(physmessage_id); ERROR 1062 (23000): Duplicate entry '294904'

[Dbmail-dev] Possible extra escape chars

2010-04-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
]) by smtp.decimal.pt (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D531E109AA9 for jo...@domain.pt; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 10:26:36 +0100 (WEST) Return-Receipt-To: Geral \(Duplano, Lda.\) dupl...@domain.pt From: Geral (Duplano, Lda.) dupl...@domain.pt To: 'Jorge Bastos - Decimal' jo...@domain.pt Subject: hp Date

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Possible extra escape chars

2010-04-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I can't reproduce this on my installations. May/could be gmime related. I'm on gmime-2.4.6. Hum possible, I'm on 2.4.14, and it's the last for what I use, Debian with SID repos. What should I do, do nothing for now? ___ Dbmail-dev

[Dbmail-dev] Some warnings on last GIT

2010-02-11 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, Here's a list of some warnings on last GIT, that you may be intered in. GCC-4.4.3 sortsieve.c: In function 'sort_vacation': sortsieve.c:227: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'dm_md5' differ in signedness .../../src/dm_digest.h:31: note: expected 'const

[Dbmail-dev] dbmail-deliver segfauls on HEAD

2010-01-30 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, Attached there's the RAW msg I was trying to insert to see if a problem that ocours with 2.3.6 still happens in HEAD. Is this fixable? I have the conscience that something may be missing on the msg body. I was going a test with dbmail-deliver, and with the git HEAD, I get:

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail-deliver segfauls on HEAD

2010-01-30 Thread Jorge Bastos
fixed. Merci :) ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

[Dbmail-dev] FW: [SCM]Paul's DBMail tree branch, master, updated. 88be58ef15798f7a3099b06b1e4e184f83551902

2010-01-20 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, This email's now came with the sender named root. I like the way it was before :P Jorge, -Original Message- From: dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-dev-boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of root Sent: quarta-feira, 20 de Janeiro de 2010 9:58 To: dbmail-dev@dbmail.org

[Dbmail-dev] Upgrading to PRE-2.3.7

2010-01-16 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, I'm handling things to upgrade to the latest GIT on the production (I've been testing on other machine), but, when I add the UNIQUE INDEX that is on the sql upgrade file, I get this: mysql CREATE UNIQUE INDEX dbmail_envelope_1 ON dbmail_envelope(physmessage_id); ERROR 1062

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Upgrading to PRE-2.3.7

2010-01-16 Thread Jorge Bastos
Im handling things to upgrade to the latest GIT on the production (Ive been testing on other machine), Please stay with a revision you have actually tested and trust. Never simply follow git-head on any production system. Yes Paul, but, the last fixes you did are very handy for me, I'll

Re: [Dbmail-dev] FETCH response may be incorrect

2010-01-15 Thread Jorge Bastos
It was a problem with message insertion. Fixed in the master branch. Thank you Paul, you're awesome! ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

[Dbmail-dev] CAPA

2010-01-15 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, Allow me to ask your push yesterday about CAPA, what does this stands for and what does it do/going to be? Jorge, ___ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

Re: [Dbmail-dev] FETCH response may be incorrect

2010-01-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Paul, Sorry to re-ask, what can you say about this? It still is a IMAP FETCH problem, right? I saw this 'cause of this bug I've report to RC. Looking at the FETCH response, for what I can understand, on the end it ends with: amsilvapi...@gmail.com,

Re: [Dbmail-dev] FETCH response may be incorrect

2010-01-13 Thread Jorge Bastos
Paul, I saw this 'cause of this bug I've report to RC. Looking at the FETCH response, for what I can understand, on the end it ends with: amsilvapi...@gmail.com, =?iso-8859-1?b?U81sdg==?= smells like bug #807, for which I've just commit a fix. With GIT HEAD, the problem

  1   2   3   4   5   >