Re: [Dbmail-dev] ACLs: 'anyone' not implemented ?

2004-08-25 Thread Ilja Booij
Aaron Stone wrote: Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Aaron Stone wrote: Oh, that's perfect then. So the next question is what steps would we want to take in the dbmail utilities to restrict access to add/modify/delete users, maintain the database, etc? That's easy. You'v

Re: [Dbmail-dev] ACLs: 'anyone' not implemented ?

2004-08-25 Thread Aaron Stone
Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Aaron Stone wrote: > >> Oh, that's perfect then. So the next question is what steps would we want >> to take in the dbmail utilities to restrict access to add/modify/delete >> users, maintain the database, etc? > > That's easy. You've already added the

Re: [Dbmail-dev] ACLs: 'anyone' not implemented ?

2004-08-24 Thread Paul J Stevens
Aaron Stone wrote: Oh, that's perfect then. So the next question is what steps would we want to take in the dbmail utilities to restrict access to add/modify/delete users, maintain the database, etc? That's easy. You've already added the -f switch to all tools. So you can already use differ

Re: [Dbmail-dev] ACLs: 'anyone' not implemented ?

2004-08-24 Thread Aaron Stone
Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Aaron Stone wrote: >> I'd like to propose that for > 2.0, we have a system like mysql does for >> access control to the database. Especially if we are moving the tools to >> man.8, it might also make sense to setuid them, make the config file root >> read-

Re: [Dbmail-dev] ACLs: 'anyone' not implemented ?

2004-08-24 Thread Paul J Stevens
Aaron Stone wrote: I'd like to propose that for > 2.0, we have a system like mysql does for access control to the database. Especially if we are moving the tools to man.8, it might also make sense to setuid them, make the config file root read-only, and then use privilege flags in the database

Re: [Dbmail-dev] ACLs: 'anyone' not implemented ?

2004-08-24 Thread Aaron Stone
Ilja Booij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >>> RFC 2086 defines the special user 'anyone' to change rights for every >>> user (for example make a mailbox readable for every user - that's what I >>> try to do). Am I right that 'anyone' isn't implemented yet? [snip] > > One key thing to notice is this: >

Re: [Dbmail-dev] ACLs: 'anyone' not implemented ?

2004-08-24 Thread Ilja Booij
Ilja Booij wrote: Thomas Mueller wrote: Hi, RFC 2086 defines the special user 'anyone' to change rights for every user (for example make a mailbox readable for every user - that's what I try to do). Am I right that 'anyone' isn't implemented yet? I've just looked through the code and thr

Re: [Dbmail-dev] ACLs: 'anyone' not implemented ?

2004-08-23 Thread Ilja Booij
Thomas Mueller wrote: Hi, RFC 2086 defines the special user 'anyone' to change rights for every user (for example make a mailbox readable for every user - that's what I try to do). Am I right that 'anyone' isn't implemented yet? I've just looked through the code and through the rfc. I can'

[Dbmail-dev] ACLs: 'anyone' not implemented ?

2004-08-23 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, RFC 2086 defines the special user 'anyone' to change rights for every user (for example make a mailbox readable for every user - that's what I try to do). Am I right that 'anyone' isn't implemented yet? Thomas -- http://www.tmueller.com for pgp key (95702B3B)