[Dbmail-dev] Address already in use

2006-02-21 Thread Oleg Lapshin
I make 1st connection to dbmail-imapd - all ok when I try to make 2nd connection (another acount), I get: RESPONSE: [145 OK UID FETCH completed ] imap4.c,IMAPClientHandler: Finished command uid [0] main(): server has exited, exit status [1] imapd.c,get_config: reading config imapd.c,SetConfigItem

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Address already in use

2006-02-21 Thread Paul J Stevens
I noticed this one as well. Not a clue as to where this one is coming from. For some reason the parent process for all the preforks is bombing out. Oleg Lapshin wrote: > I make 1st connection to dbmail-imapd - all ok > when I try to make 2nd connection (another acount), I get: > > RESPONSE: [145

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Address already in use

2006-02-21 Thread Oleg Lapshin
> I noticed this one as well. Not a clue as to where this one is coming > from. For some reason the parent process for all the preforks is bombing > out. But, there were no such problem in revision 1991... And one more thing: my mail client said, that dbmail doesn't have VACATION capability... (I

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Address already in use

2006-02-21 Thread Paul J Stevens
Oleg Lapshin wrote: >>I noticed this one as well. Not a clue as to where this one is coming >>from. For some reason the parent process for all the preforks is bombing >>out. > > > But, there were no such problem in revision 1991... I started seeing this day before yesterday. My best guess is t

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Address already in use

2006-02-21 Thread Oleg Lapshin
> Oleg Lapshin wrote: > >>I noticed this one as well. Not a clue as to where this one is coming > >>from. For some reason the parent process for all the preforks is bombing > >>out. > > > > But, there were no such problem in revision 1991... > > I started seeing this day before yesterday. My best g

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Address already in use

2006-02-21 Thread Paul J Stevens
Thanks Oleg, Looks like more signal trouble. Oleg Lapshin wrote: >>Oleg Lapshin wrote: >> I noticed this one as well. Not a clue as to where this one is coming from. For some reason the parent process for all the preforks is bombing out. >>> >>>But, there were no such problem in revis

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Address already in use

2006-02-21 Thread Aaron Stone
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 15:26 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote: > >>>And one more thing: > >>>my mail client said, that dbmail doesn't have VACATION capability... > >>>(I have SIEVE_VACATION=yes in config) That config option doesn't actually work yet. The capability string for timsieved is broken, I'll

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Address already in use

2006-02-21 Thread Aaron Stone
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 08:39 -0800, Aaron Stone wrote: > On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 15:26 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote: > > > >>>And one more thing: > > >>>my mail client said, that dbmail doesn't have VACATION capability... > > >>>(I have SIEVE_VACATION=yes in config) > > That config option doesn't act