Re: [Dbmail-dev] Any reason not to put the prefix patch into RC8 for the 2.0 release?

2004-09-27 Thread Ilja Booij
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:53:25 +0200, Paul J Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2.0 is frozen solid. Bugfixes only (so unless you want to file a bug against the dbmail_ prefix...). And about time we ship that product. I don't see anything major at the moment holding up 2.0.0-final. Yep. No more

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Any reason not to put the prefix patch into RC8 for the 2.0 release?

2004-09-27 Thread Paul J Stevens
Ilja Booij wrote: On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:53:25 +0200, Paul J Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leif, I see your point, but I feel that migration from 1.2 to 2.0 will be and remain non-trivial for all users. In fact, so much so, that I feel that dbmail-smtp/imapd/pop3d actually should refuse

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Any reason not to put the prefix patch into RC8 for the 2.0 release?

2004-09-27 Thread Paul J Stevens
Ilja Booij wrote: On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:53:25 +0200, Paul J Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leif, I see your point, but I feel that migration from 1.2 to 2.0 will be and remain non-trivial for all users. In fact, so much so, that I feel that dbmail-smtp/imapd/pop3d actually should refuse