[Dbmail-dev] Re: Sieve status today

2006-02-20 Thread Oleg Lapshin
Hello! > Progress! > Reject returns a failure code. > Subaddress works with the forthcoming libSieve 2.1.9. > Vacation works at the Sieve level, but isn't coded up in DBMail. I'm not > happy with the amount of code duplication in pipe.c, and would like to > have send_reply, send_notification and

[Dbmail-dev] Re: Sieve status today

2006-02-20 Thread Oleg Lapshin
> libSieve 2.1.9 is now posted and work on DBMail is in SVN. I tried libsieve-2.1.9.tar.gz from 2 different mirrors, but: $ tar xzf libsieve-2.1.9.tar.gz tar: Skipping to next header tar: Archive contains obsolescent base-64 headers gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--format violated tar: Ch

[Dbmail-dev] Re: Sieve status today

2006-02-20 Thread Oleg Lapshin
> libSieve 2.1.9 is now posted and work on DBMail is in SVN. > Tomorrow I'll get the pipe.c stuff going so that vacation can work. I downloaded "new" libsieve-2.1.9 Now it's ok. I am happy!!! ;) Excelent work! Thank you! -- Oleg Lapshin

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: Sieve status today

2006-02-20 Thread Aaron Stone
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 13:26 +0300, Oleg Lapshin wrote: > Can you commit both libSieve and dbmail? > Or where can I get them today? libSieve 2.1.9 is now posted and work on DBMail is in SVN. Tomorrow I'll get the pipe.c stuff going so that vacation can work. Aaron

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: Sieve status today

2006-02-20 Thread Paul J Stevens
Yeah, definitely broken. Aaron, you getting enough sleep? Oleg Lapshin wrote: >>libSieve 2.1.9 is now posted and work on DBMail is in SVN. > > > I tried libsieve-2.1.9.tar.gz from 2 different mirrors, but: > > > $ tar xzf libsieve-2.1.9.tar.gz > tar: Skipping to next header > tar: Archive cont

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: Sieve status today

2006-02-20 Thread Aaron Stone
The file I just downloaded was SF is 3k larger than the one I uploaded. Very weird. New file posted. The size should be: 762488, rather than 765341. MD5 is 94743041a5718ce37b292af75b9a1199. Aaron On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 15:36 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote: > Yeah, definitely broken. Aaron, you getti