[Dbmail-dev] Re: trunk 2067 UID SEARCH NOT broken?

2006-04-12 Thread UEMURA (fka. MAENAKA) Tetsuya
Sorry, I forgot to attach log. -- UEMURA (fka. MAENAKA) Tetsuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Posted on Wed, 12 Apr 2006 20:03:22 +0900 by author UEMURA (fka. MAENAKA) Tetsuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi all. > > Now I'm testing 2.1 on FreeBSD 6-STABLE. With trunk 2067, imap ``UID > SEARCH NOT ...'' seems b

[Dbmail-dev] Re: trunk 2067 UID SEARCH NOT broken?

2006-04-13 Thread UEMURA Tetsuya
Attached patch fixes ``NOT ...'' issue, though, subsequent bugs may arise. -- UEMURA (fka. MAENAKA) Tetsuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Posted on Wed, 12 Apr 2006 20:03:22 +0900 > by author UEMURA (fka. MAENAKA) Tetsuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi all. > > > > Now I'm testing 2.1 on FreeBSD 6-STABLE.

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: trunk 2067 UID SEARCH NOT broken?

2006-04-14 Thread Paul J Stevens
Tetsuya, I've used your approach as a starting point to fix this issue. I think it works now. Could you please test rev 2069. UEMURA Tetsuya wrote: > Attached patch fixes ``NOT ...'' issue, though, subsequent bugs may > arise. > > > > ---

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: trunk 2067 UID SEARCH NOT broken?

2006-04-14 Thread UEMURA (fka. MAENAKA) Tetsuya
Hi Paul, your commit looks fine. Thanks. -- UEMURA (fka. MAENAKA) Tetsuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Posted on Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:29:10 +0200 by author Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > it works now. Could you please test rev 2069. dbmail.err Description: Binary data

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: trunk 2067 UID SEARCH NOT broken?

2006-04-17 Thread UEMURA (fka. MAENAKA) Tetsuya
Paul, attached patch is trivial but necessary not to get assertion failure produced by g_tree_nnodes(). -- UEMURA (fka. MAENAKA) Tetsuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Posted on Sat, 15 Apr 2006 00:55:28 +0900 (JST) by author UEMURA (fka. MAENAKA) Tetsuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi Paul, your commit looks fi