Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: umask 0 for log files?

2007-02-28 Thread Aaron Stone
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 21:40 -0700, Bernard Johnson wrote: > Bernard Johnson wrote: > > Paul J Stevens wrote: > >> Seems like a bug. I'm removing the umask call. > > > > I would think you want the logs written as 0600 since they may have > > sensitive data from the logs. > > > >> Bernard Johnson

[Dbmail-dev] Re: umask 0 for log files?

2007-02-28 Thread Bernard Johnson
Bernard Johnson wrote: > Paul J Stevens wrote: >> Seems like a bug. I'm removing the umask call. > > I would think you want the logs written as 0600 since they may have > sensitive data from the logs. > >> Bernard Johnson wrote: >>> (dbmail 2.2.2) >>> >>> In server.c, line 450 you set the umask

[Dbmail-dev] Re: umask 0 for log files?

2007-02-01 Thread Bernard Johnson
Paul J Stevens wrote: > Seems like a bug. I'm removing the umask call. I would think you want the logs written as 0600 since they may have sensitive data from the logs. > Bernard Johnson wrote: >> (dbmail 2.2.2) >> >> In server.c, line 450 you set the umask to 0. This allows the log files >> to