On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 01:06:43 -, Aaron Stone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Has the infinite loop IMAP problem been fixed? Last I checked it was
> > still there. -sc
>
> I don't think it has, and I'm not sure that anyone has a good handle on
> wh
Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Has the infinite loop IMAP problem been fixed? Last I checked it was
> still there. -sc
I don't think it has, and I'm not sure that anyone has a good handle on
what's wrong yet. My feeling is that unless we can fix it this week, we
should go ahead wi
Since it was I who decided to apply those patches it was my mistake.
I know I heeded your warning and added the res_changed=1 in
db_get_length.
Turns out I did so in cvs-head, but forgot to update the patchset for
2_0.
No worries, all sorted out now. I think we're clear for 2.0.1 at this
point
Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Since it was I who decided to apply those patches it was my mistake.
> I know I heeded your warning and added the res_changed=1 in db_get_length.
> Turns out I did so in cvs-head, but forgot to update the patchset for 2_0.
No worries, all sorted out now.
Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
The bug appears to be very subtle. When I was backing out Mikhail's
patches one at a time, there was a one-line hunk of the dbmysql_v2.patch
that didn't reverse because it had not been applied.
This probably means that the first version of the dbmys
Aaron Stone wrote:
The bug appears to be very subtle. When I was backing out Mikhail's
patches one at a time, there was a one-line hunk of the dbmysql_v2.patch
that didn't reverse because it had not been applied.
This probably means that the first version of the dbmysql patch was
applied. It d
The bug appears to be very subtle. When I was backing out Mikhail's
patches one at a time, there was a one-line hunk of the dbmysql_v2.patch
that didn't reverse because it had not been applied. The problem
disappears if the patch is fully applied or fully reversed, and reappears
reliably with the f
Something's very, very screwy with one of the patches that have been
applied to dbmail_2_0_branch. I'm finding about 20% of the messages in my
INBOX simply refuse to return a message structure. This results in weird
blank spaces in my webmail client (TWIG 2.8.0) and if I open a message
that does w
