Hans Kristian Rosbach wrote:
I too am not familiar with the 2.0 schema yet.. And I do think that
some of the stuff that has changed since 1.0 were totally useless.
I'm going to get digging to see wether this is true or not.
I might also propose a whole new schema, but I do not expect it to
be
On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 12:31, Paul J Stevens wrote:
Hans Kristian Rosbach wrote:
I too am not familiar with the 2.0 schema yet.. And I do think that
some of the stuff that has changed since 1.0 were totally useless.
I'm going to get digging to see wether this is true or not.
I might also
Hans Kristian Rosbach wrote:
Well, this sucks.. But I guess it's nice for IMAP users. But does
people actually copy messages that much? I've never done so myself,
and I don't really see any big use for it. In my openion it is not
worth it to make everything else slow and complex in order to
Hans Kristian Rosbach wrote:
Well, this sucks.. But I guess it's nice for IMAP users. But does
people actually copy messages that much? I've never done so myself,
and I don't really see any big use for it. In my openion it is not
worth it to make everything else slow and complex in order to
On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 14:41, Paul J Stevens wrote:
Hans Kristian Rosbach wrote:
Well, this sucks.. But I guess it's nice for IMAP users. But does
people actually copy messages that much? I've never done so myself,
and I don't really see any big use for it. In my openion it is not
worth it
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 13:27:59 +0100, Hans Kristian Rosbach
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, in order to get one message we need to look it up in this order:
Users-Mailboxes-Physmessages-mailblks
Well, this sucks.. But I guess it's nice for IMAP users. But does
No, it doesn't suck.
Hans Kristian Rosbach wrote:
On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 14:41, Paul J Stevens wrote:
I know I use
copy *a lot*, and I know many people who use client-side filtering for sorting
and spam-filtering. Copying must be as fast and cheap as possible.
So you can have two spam mails instead of one?
people actually copy messages that much? I've never done so myself,
and I don't really see any big use for it. In my openion it is not
worth it to make everything else slow and complex in order to speed
up a seldomly used function. The move argument is not true I think,
couldn't
Ilja Booij wrote:
I think you're a bit confused. Your earlier point that DBMail database
layout needs documentation is very valid here.
I've started some kind of documentation in the wiki
( http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=er-model )
- it's neither complete nor am I sure that it
: Monday, November 01, 2004 7:22 AM
To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Suggested schema changes (Was: Some comments)
Hans Kristian Rosbach wrote:
Well, this sucks.. But I guess it's nice for IMAP users. But does
people actually copy messages that much? I've never done
10 matches
Mail list logo
