I hear Lars was succesful running automake1.7, but I always use 1.9
Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I try to build packages of current svn 2121 for Debian Sarge, but I fail
> because of an automake error:
>
> autoreconf -i
> Putting files in AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR, `buildtools'.
> automake: configure
Hi,
I try to build packages of current svn 2121 for Debian Sarge, but I fail
because of an automake error:
autoreconf -i
Putting files in AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR, `buildtools'.
automake: configure.in: installing `buildtools/install-sh'
automake: configure.in: installing `buildtools/mkinstalldirs'
autom
Created
http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=trace_level
to lay out the ideas/plans for this.
[snippage]
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 23:21 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote:
> Aaron Stone wrote:
> > ... I plan on changing the trace levels around some more anyways.
>
> Please do. I find it quite annoyin
Aaron Stone wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 14:39 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote:
>
>
>>Only people using mixed-case keys need to fix their config. That was
>>never documentated as a valid example, so until proved wrong I will
>>assume only a very small minority of users will be affected.
>
>
> I d
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 14:39 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote:
> Only people using mixed-case keys need to fix their config. That was
> never documentated as a valid example, so until proved wrong I will
> assume only a very small minority of users will be affected.
I do love the corner cases. Lazy me,
Aaron Stone wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 08:45 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote:
>
>>Aaron Stone wrote:
>>
>>>Let's just make the whole config file lower case. I rather dislike the
>>>needless use of upper case.
>>
>>Agreed. But config_get_value should also check for uppercase keys, for
>>backward
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 08:45 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote:
> Aaron Stone wrote:
> > Let's just make the whole config file lower case. I rather dislike the
> > needless use of upper case.
>
> Agreed. But config_get_value should also check for uppercase keys, for
> backward compatibility's sake.
Woul
Aaron Stone wrote:
> Let's just make the whole config file lower case. I rather dislike the
> needless use of upper case.
Agreed. But config_get_value should also check for uppercase keys, for
backward compatibility's sake.
--
Let's just make the whole config file lower case. I rather dislike the
needless use of upper case.
Aaron
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 16:11 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've fixed stuff so it works now with automake1.9 and autoconf2.59
>
> As a sidenote: I've completely removed ./lib/ wh
Hi all,
I've fixed stuff so it works now with automake1.9 and autoconf2.59
As a sidenote: I've completely removed ./lib/ which contained iniparser.
config.c now uses GKeyFile. Only difference is that GKeyFile is case-sensitive
wrt the keys looked up. But I've made provisions so backward compatibi
Aaron Stone wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 20:11 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote:
>
>>Aaron Stone wrote:
>>
>>>Looks like 1.9 is my default, although my system has:
>>>
>>>automake automake-1.4 automake-1.5 automake-1.6 automake-1.7
>>>automake-1.8 automake-1.9
>>>
>>>Where 'automake' is a wr
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 20:11 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote:
> Aaron Stone wrote:
> > Looks like 1.9 is my default, although my system has:
> >
> > automake automake-1.4 automake-1.5 automake-1.6 automake-1.7
> > automake-1.8 automake-1.9
> >
> > Where 'automake' is a wrapper script. I'm on
Aaron Stone wrote:
> Looks like 1.9 is my default, although my system has:
>
> automake automake-1.4 automake-1.5 automake-1.6 automake-1.7
> automake-1.8 automake-1.9
>
> Where 'automake' is a wrapper script. I'm on Gentoo Linux, so they've
> obviously had to heavily work around the aut
Looks like 1.9 is my default, although my system has:
automake automake-1.4 automake-1.5 automake-1.6 automake-1.7
automake-1.8 automake-1.9
Where 'automake' is a wrapper script. I'm on Gentoo Linux, so they've
obviously had to heavily work around the autotools version madness.
Aaron
Aaron,
I've done some more fixes in the autotools chain to allow static builds.
--enable-shared=no is now respected in the code.
I need this for my unit-tests and it greatly speeds up the build.
Paul J Stevens wrote:
> Aaron,
>
> What version of automake are you on?
>
> Building suddenly br
Aaron,
What version of automake are you on?
Building suddenly breaks on AM_LDFLAGS running automake1.4
Switching to automake1.9 only makes things worse.
:-(
--
Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 10:19, Roel Rozendaal - IC&S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> frankly, i have never developed using automake. Are there any
> guidelines for creating the code as in compiler directives to use? I
> would love to see all new dbmail code working at once with automake
> (although personally,
Hi,
frankly, i have never developed using automake. Are there any
guidelines for creating the code as in compiler directives to use? I
would love to see all new dbmail code working at once with automake
(although personally, i have a special bond with that lovely home-made
build.sh script ;-)
18 matches
Mail list logo
