Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Someone with access to freebsd please help me out here. Ilja?
BTW, I don't have a FreeBSD machine here, so I can't test it.
Does someone have a FreeBSD machine that they can provide accounts on? I
could set one up at home, but it would be on a DSL line
what do you need?
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] current cvs head doesn't compiles under freebsd
5.2.1
Ilja Booij [EMAIL
M. J. [Mike] O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
what do you need?
It sounds like Ilja and Paul are hitting some FreeBSD issues, I guess
mostly with the default options that FreeBSD's GCC uses.
Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Someone with access to freebsd please help me out here. Ilja?
Does someone have a FreeBSD machine that they can provide accounts on?
I could set one up at home, but it would be on a DSL line with a slow
uplink rate.
Aaron
--
M. J. [Mike] O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
what do you need?
It sounds like Ilja and Paul are hitting some FreeBSD issues, I
What about sourceforge's compile farm?
Does someone have a FreeBSD machine that they can provide accounts on? I
could set one up at home, but it would be on a DSL line with a slow uplink
rate.
Aaron
--
Jesse Norell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is not my email address;
change administrator to my
I don't get it. Why doesn't freebsd like this code?
code
void manage_stop_children()
{
/*
*
* cleanup all remaining forked processes
*
*/
trace(TRACE_MESSAGE, %s,%s: General stop requested. Killing children..
,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:03:36 +0200, Paul J Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't get it. Why doesn't freebsd like this code?
code
void manage_stop_children()
{
/*
*
* cleanup all remaining forked processes
*
*/
But then, building with -pedantic triggers loads of warnings :-(
Ilja Booij wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:03:36 +0200, Paul J Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't get it. Why doesn't freebsd like this code?
code
void manage_stop_children()
{
/*
*
* cleanup
Hi Paul,
I don't get it. Why doesn't freebsd like this code?
code
void manage_stop_children()
{
/*
*
* cleanup all remaining forked processes
*
*/
trace(TRACE_MESSAGE, %s,%s: General stop requested. Killing
children.. ,
I'll switch to building the debian packages with -pedantic -std=c99
I've also committed the change suggested by Ilja.
What's the score on freebsd? Anyone care to test, please?
Paul J Stevens wrote:
But then, building with -pedantic triggers loads of warnings :-(
Ilja Booij wrote:
On
Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi Paul,
I don't get it. Why doesn't freebsd like this code?
code
void manage_stop_children()
{
/*
*
* cleanup all remaining forked processes
*
*/
trace(TRACE_MESSAGE, %s,%s: General stop requested. Killing
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:52:08 +0200, Paul J Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi Paul,
I don't get it. Why doesn't freebsd like this code?
It appears gcc on freebsd doesn't like 'int var=0' type declarations inside
functions. Or am I missing something else
12 matches
Mail list logo