Re: [Dbmail-dev] current cvs head doesn't compiles under freebsd 5.2.1

2004-09-15 Thread Aaron Stone
Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Someone with access to freebsd please help me out here. Ilja? BTW, I don't have a FreeBSD machine here, so I can't test it. Does someone have a FreeBSD machine that they can provide accounts on? I could set one up at home, but it would be on a DSL line

Re: [Dbmail-dev] current cvs head doesn't compiles under freebsd 5.2.1

2004-09-15 Thread M. J. [Mike] O'Brien
what do you need? Mike - Original Message - From: Aaron Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist dbmail-dev@dbmail.org Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 8:57 PM Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] current cvs head doesn't compiles under freebsd 5.2.1 Ilja Booij [EMAIL

Re: [Dbmail-dev] current cvs head doesn't compiles under freebsd 5.2.1

2004-09-15 Thread Aaron Stone
M. J. [Mike] O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: what do you need? It sounds like Ilja and Paul are hitting some FreeBSD issues, I guess mostly with the default options that FreeBSD's GCC uses. Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Someone with access to freebsd please help me out here. Ilja?

Re: [Dbmail-dev] current cvs head doesn't compiles under freebsd 5.2.1 - FreeBSD users Note that issue is FIXED

2004-09-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does someone have a FreeBSD machine that they can provide accounts on? I could set one up at home, but it would be on a DSL line with a slow uplink rate. Aaron -- M. J. [Mike] O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: what do you need? It sounds like Ilja and Paul are hitting some FreeBSD issues, I

Re: [Dbmail-dev] current cvs head doesn't compiles under freebsd 5.2.1

2004-09-15 Thread Jesse Norell
What about sourceforge's compile farm? Does someone have a FreeBSD machine that they can provide accounts on? I could set one up at home, but it would be on a DSL line with a slow uplink rate. Aaron -- Jesse Norell [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not my email address; change administrator to my

Re: [Dbmail-dev] current cvs head doesn't compiles under freebsd 5.2.1

2004-09-14 Thread Paul J Stevens
I don't get it. Why doesn't freebsd like this code? code void manage_stop_children() { /* * * cleanup all remaining forked processes * */ trace(TRACE_MESSAGE, %s,%s: General stop requested. Killing children.. ,

Re: [Dbmail-dev] current cvs head doesn't compiles under freebsd 5.2.1

2004-09-14 Thread Ilja Booij
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:03:36 +0200, Paul J Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't get it. Why doesn't freebsd like this code? code void manage_stop_children() { /* * * cleanup all remaining forked processes * */

Re: [Dbmail-dev] current cvs head doesn't compiles under freebsd 5.2.1

2004-09-14 Thread Paul J Stevens
But then, building with -pedantic triggers loads of warnings :-( Ilja Booij wrote: On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:03:36 +0200, Paul J Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't get it. Why doesn't freebsd like this code? code void manage_stop_children() { /* * * cleanup

Re: [Dbmail-dev] current cvs head doesn't compiles under freebsd 5.2.1

2004-09-14 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Paul, I don't get it. Why doesn't freebsd like this code? code void manage_stop_children() { /* * * cleanup all remaining forked processes * */ trace(TRACE_MESSAGE, %s,%s: General stop requested. Killing children.. ,

Re: [Dbmail-dev] current cvs head doesn't compiles under freebsd 5.2.1

2004-09-14 Thread Paul J Stevens
I'll switch to building the debian packages with -pedantic -std=c99 I've also committed the change suggested by Ilja. What's the score on freebsd? Anyone care to test, please? Paul J Stevens wrote: But then, building with -pedantic triggers loads of warnings :-( Ilja Booij wrote: On

Re: [Dbmail-dev] current cvs head doesn't compiles under freebsd 5.2.1

2004-09-14 Thread Paul J Stevens
Thomas Mueller wrote: Hi Paul, I don't get it. Why doesn't freebsd like this code? code void manage_stop_children() { /* * * cleanup all remaining forked processes * */ trace(TRACE_MESSAGE, %s,%s: General stop requested. Killing

Re: [Dbmail-dev] current cvs head doesn't compiles under freebsd 5.2.1

2004-09-14 Thread Ilja Booij
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:52:08 +0200, Paul J Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thomas Mueller wrote: Hi Paul, I don't get it. Why doesn't freebsd like this code? It appears gcc on freebsd doesn't like 'int var=0' type declarations inside functions. Or am I missing something else