Peter,
On second look please test this patch against rev 2579 vanila:
Index: dbmail-mailbox.c
===
--- dbmail-mailbox.c(revision 2579)
+++ dbmail-mailbox.c(working copy)
@@ -1313,7 +1313,7 @@
GTree * dbmail_mailbox_get_set(st
Leif Jackson wrote:
> Peter,
>
> On second look please test this patch against rev 2579 vanila:
> Index: dbmail-mailbox.c
> ===
> --- dbmail-mailbox.c(revision 2579)
> +++ dbmail-mailbox.c(working copy)
> @@ -1313,7 +1313,7 @@
On Wed, May 16, 2007, Peter Rabbitson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Leif Jackson wrote:
>> Peter,
>>
>> On second look please test this patch against rev 2579 vanila:
>> Index: dbmail-mailbox.c
>> ===
>> --- dbmail-mailbox.c(revisi
Aaron Stone wrote:
> This might sound stupid, but is your dbmail.conf unusually large? Like
> maybe some filesystem corruption concatenated it together with a 71MB file
> from someplace else?
It would be a possibility if the amount of wasted memory was not tied
directly to the amount of messages p
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 12:34 +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> Aaron Stone wrote:
> > This might sound stupid, but is your dbmail.conf unusually large? Like
> > maybe some filesystem corruption concatenated it together with a 71MB file
> > from someplace else?
>
> It would be a possibility if the amo
