Aaron Stone wrote:
> We should make this change in CVS for both HEAD and dbmail_2_0_branch and
> put a note on the website that 2.0.0 may have compatibility issues with
> MySQL 4.1.x.
Is there a cvs dbmail_2_0_branch already? If so, I'd really like to know
the decision on including my patches. Th
Mikhail Ramendik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Alternatively just search that file for "db_real_query", because that's
> the call where it does the <0 check, and change the check there to !=0 .
We should make this change in CVS for both HEAD and dbmail_2_0_branch and
put a note on the website that
Bernard Johnson wrote:
> Incompatible change: TIMESTAMP is now returned as a string in
> '-MM-DD HH:MM:SS' format (from 4.0.12 the --new option can be used to
> make a 4.0 server behave as 4.1 in this respect). See section 12.3.1.2
> TIMESTAMP Properties as of MySQL 4.1. If you want to have th
Seeing that mysql 4.1.7 is now "GA", I started looking into upgrading a
couple of servers. I took some time to read through the release notes
(http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/Upgrading-from-4.0.html), and I found
two things that looked like they might cause some fits with dbmail 2.0.0.
Can some
