Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail rev 2.0 public folders question

2003-10-10 Thread Christian G. Warden
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 03:07:01PM +0200, Ilja Booij wrote: > features that require database change: > * storing headers in messages table > * shared folders > * libSieve support (Aaron Stone) > * changing names in db (messages to message etc) > > anybody have any additions? I've added an timesta

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail rev 2.0 public folders question

2003-10-10 Thread Jesse Norell
> > features that require database change: > > * storing headers in messages table > > * shared folders > > * libSieve support (Aaron Stone) > > * changing names in db (messages to message etc) > > > > anybody have any additions? One more thing - there has been a fairly high interest in auto-r

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail rev 2.0 public folders question

2003-10-10 Thread Jesse Norell
> features that require database change: > * storing headers in messages table > * shared folders > * libSieve support (Aaron Stone) > * changing names in db (messages to message etc) > > anybody have any additions? The usermap table, if that feature is adopted (trivial). There was also ano

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail rev 2.0 public folders question

2003-10-10 Thread Ilja Booij
On Friday, Oct 10, 2003, at 14:57 Europe/Amsterdam, Magnus Sundberg wrote: Hi, I remember a discussion earlier about new database scheme and public folders. I am still a bit curious. public aka shared folders is something we would still like to implement. Or rather we still HAVE to implemen

[Dbmail-dev] dbmail rev 2.0 public folders question

2003-10-10 Thread Magnus Sundberg
Hi, I remember a discussion earlier about new database scheme and public folders. I am still a bit curious. /Magnus