Chris Mason wrote:
> The f in :0fw tells procmail the pipe is a filter, so it expects to
> put the resulting output somewhere, instead of thinking the pipe is a
> delivery mechanism. Try it without the f.
>
> Also try setting
> LOGFILE=$MAILDIR/log and then look at the log file to see where
> pro
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 10:19, Matt Dickinson wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
> >
> > procmail can do much of this for you, when the dbmail-smtp fails it
> > falls back to deliver into the default spool file. This gives you
> > /var/spool/mail/$user
> >
> > When the database comes back up, run formail
Chris Mason wrote:
>
> procmail can do much of this for you, when the dbmail-smtp fails it
> falls back to deliver into the default spool file. This gives you
> /var/spool/mail/$user
>
> When the database comes back up, run formail -s procmail <
> /var/spool/mail/$user as each user and things wi
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 09:55, Matt Dickinson wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
>
> >
> > It seems to have something to do with procmail, I can't reproduce when
> > inserting the messages manually. Looking harder...
>
> I noticed that you insert messages via "dbmail-smtp -m mailbox -u mason",
> I've go
Chris Mason wrote:
>
> It seems to have something to do with procmail, I can't reproduce when
> inserting the messages manually. Looking harder...
I noticed that you insert messages via "dbmail-smtp -m mailbox -u mason",
I've got approx 20 users using procmail to insert their mail with
dbmail-s
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 09:39, Chris Mason wrote:
[ empty messages in database ]
> > > This happens to about 1 out of 20 of the messages.
> > > Does this sound like a known issue?
> > Does not sound famaliar to me..
> > If it's both in dbmail 1.2 and 2.0 it's probably some "old" bug.
> >
> > could
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 09:17, Ilja Booij wrote:
> On Wednesday, Oct 15, 2003, at 14:57 Europe/Amsterdam, Chris Mason
> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I'm using dbmail 1.2 from cvs (Oct 12), and also reproduced on
> > 2.0-alpha1. I'm delivering to dbmail-smtp through procmail.
> >
> > When I
On Wednesday, Oct 15, 2003, at 14:57 Europe/Amsterdam, Chris Mason
wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm using dbmail 1.2 from cvs (Oct 12), and also reproduced on
2.0-alpha1. I'm delivering to dbmail-smtp through procmail.
When I use dbmail-smtp -d alias to deliver, things work fine.
When I use dbmai
Hello everyone,
I'm using dbmail 1.2 from cvs (Oct 12), and also reproduced on
2.0-alpha1. I'm delivering to dbmail-smtp through procmail.
When I use dbmail-smtp -d alias to deliver, things work fine.
When I use dbmail-smtp -m mailbox -u mason to deliver, I get some
corrupted entries in the dat
