Re: [Dbmail-dev] sqlrelay as alternative database interface for dbmail

2008-12-04 Thread Paul J Stevens
Uwe Kiewel wrote: > SQLRelay brins it's own C, C++, Perl, etc. API. So, my intention was to > try to implement SQLRelay's C-API into linzdb... My point is that that is very tricky by design, if not downright unwise. -- Paul St

Re: [Dbmail-dev] sqlrelay as alternative database interface for dbmail

2008-12-04 Thread Uwe Kiewel
Paul J Stevens schrieb: Uwe Kiewel wrote: On the other hand: dbmail + libzdb + postgresql already *is* big-iron. might be true... but the wrong database for me. If somebody sit down and write an extension to libzdb - say the sqlrelay interface, will it work with dbmail? Yes, in principle.

Re: [Dbmail-dev] sqlrelay as alternative database interface for dbmail

2008-12-04 Thread Paul J Stevens
Uwe Kiewel wrote: >> On the other hand: dbmail + libzdb + postgresql already *is* big-iron. >> >> > > might be true... but the wrong database for me. > > If somebody sit down and write an extension to libzdb - say the sqlrelay > interface, will it work with dbmail? Yes, in principle. But doing

Re: [Dbmail-dev] sqlrelay as alternative database interface for dbmail

2008-12-04 Thread Uwe Kiewel
Paul J Stevens wrote: Uwe Kiewel wrote: Hi, at first I know, dbmail-2.3 and later uses a new db interface with libzdb. However, you you think there is a way to implement an interface to sqlreay into dbmail? The advantage I see is to have an interface to db backends with the free choice of the

Re: [Dbmail-dev] sqlrelay as alternative database interface for dbmail

2008-12-04 Thread Paul J Stevens
Uwe Kiewel wrote: > Hi, > > at first I know, dbmail-2.3 and later uses a new db interface with libzdb. > > However, you you think there is a way to implement an interface to > sqlreay into dbmail? > > The advantage I see is to have an interface to db backends with the free > choice of the db. >

Re: [Dbmail-dev] sqlrelay as alternative database interface for dbmail

2008-12-04 Thread Uwe Kiewel
Jorge Bastos wrote: My opinion is that i think it's a good ideia, but after all this recoding for libzdb, it's complicated to do the same for sqlrelay. I'm not a coder. My idea is to have --with-libzdb or --with-sqlrelay as option for configuring the code. ___

RE: [Dbmail-dev] sqlrelay as alternative database interface for dbmail

2008-12-04 Thread Jorge Bastos
4 de Dezembro de 2008 13:54 > To: DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist > Subject: [Dbmail-dev] sqlrelay as alternative database interface for > dbmail > > Hi, > > at first I know, dbmail-2.3 and later uses a new db interface with > libzdb. > > However, you you think there

[Dbmail-dev] sqlrelay as alternative database interface for dbmail

2008-12-04 Thread Uwe Kiewel
Hi, at first I know, dbmail-2.3 and later uses a new db interface with libzdb. However, you you think there is a way to implement an interface to sqlreay into dbmail? The advantage I see is to have an interface to db backends with the free choice of the db. SQLrelay supports many common da