Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] The case of the missing abstracts

Hello, On 24.02.2011 19:07, Paul Houle wrote: >On 2/24/2011 11:38 AM, Sören Auer wrote: >> Paul, >> >> To me this looks rather like an issue for Wikipedia. Our extractor >> extracts the text before the first heading of an article as abstract and >> this corresponds to the suggested authoring s

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Ontology file?

Hi Darren, As far as I know, all the relationships between the 272 classes (including subClassOf) coming from DBpedia are in the DBpedia Ontology file. http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.6/dbpedia_3.6.owl.bz2 The relationships between classes and instances, on the other hand, should be in the "DBpedia

[Dbpedia-discussion] Ontology file?

Hi, Is there a single RDF/s or OWL file that provides the complete DBPedia ontology? I tried here http://wiki.dbpedia.org/Downloads36#dbpediaontology but that is small and lacks all of the entities I see in the web browser version here http://dbpedia.org/page/ I'm looking, primarily, for the su

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia Lookup Service => am I wrong or was it more forgiving in the past?

Hi Max, Thank you very much for taking the time to fix the service! > I made some changes to the Lookup service. It should be more forgiving > of punctuation in general and of word order in KeywordSearch. The > examples you gave all work now. Confirmed working :-) This is really great! Have a go

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia Lookup Service => am I wrong or was it more forgiving in the past?

Hi Tom, On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 09:09, Thomas Steiner wrote: > could it be that it used to be more forgiving in the past? Let > me illustrate with a couple of queries for "martin luther king": > > http://lookup.dbpedia.org/api/search.asmx/KeywordSearch?&QueryString=martin+luther+king > => no resul