Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Odp: Re: DBpedia ontology - predicate constraints

2014-03-22 Thread Pablo N. Mendes
Well, that is a straw man argument, because you picked a triple that contains a blatant error. Nobody is arguing that Berlin should become a country, or that we should reuse the property country in the wrong context. Now... there is the need to detect that country is wrong in that context. This co

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Odp: Re: DBpedia ontology - predicate constraints

2014-03-22 Thread Mike Bergman
I agree totally with Aleksander. Further, Pablo, I also think it was wrong to frame this discussion as data v schema. A true *data* perspective should also respect to what the data applies and in what context. These are the express purposes of domain and range. Mike On 3/22/2014 5:30 PM, apoh

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Extracting DBPedia Framework

2014-03-22 Thread Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt
On 21 March 2014 15:32, Paulo Torres wrote: > > Hi, > i´m trying to extract the DBPedia Framework but i get na error. > I´m using Java7 and Maven 3.2.1. > When i execute the comand: > > mvn scala:run "-Dlauncher=download" "-DaddArgs=config=download-config-file" Where did you find this? It's a b

[Dbpedia-discussion] Odp: Re: DBpedia ontology - predicate constraints

2014-03-22 Thread apoh...@o2.pl
Hi Pablo, well, for me this seems a very interesting opinion, but I am pretty confused. First of all I guess these opinions are not equal in their support. Why I think so? Because when we drop argument constraints (I mean, we do not apply them if they are defined) we no longer follow the mathem

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia ontology - predicate constraints

2014-03-22 Thread Pablo N. Mendes
I disagree that this has been only negligence. There are people that believe that constraining the schema is a good thing, and there are people that believe that reusing more freely properties across multiple classes is a good thing. It's a schema driven versus data driven approach. But since the