Hoi,
This would be awesome ... truly ...
On 19 May 2010 21:42, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Semantic MediaWiki extension has been out for years now but it looks
> like it will take some time until it is installed on Wikipedia. In the
> meantime, maybe DBpedia could host a copy of Wikipedia with the Sema
Hoi,
I blog every now and again about DBpedia.. I did it again.. when you have
good ideas how we can use the DBpedia to improve Wikipedia, to enrich
Wikipedia let me know.. when I understand what you are saying, I am happy to
blog about it.
Thanks,
GerardM
http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.co
Hoi,
When you use an application, it does not follow that the content becomes
part of that license. It is perfectly ok to create proprietary fiction
writing OpenOffice or conversely writing public domain fiction using
MS/Word.
The licensing of the material generated by DBpedia has Wikipedia as its
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Gerard Meijssen
> wrote:
> > I am really pleased that you are willing to follow the WMF in this but as
> I
> > have argued on this list in the past, DBpedia is a collection of facts..
>
> Yes, people keep repeating that... yet EU law,
e under a more liberal license then Wikipedia.
>
>
>
> If somebody with a solid legal background knows the answers to these
> questions, we would be more than happy if he could give us some advice.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
Hoi,
As expected the Wikimedia Foundation will change its licensing. In the past
it was said that DBpedia would follow suit. It is important that it does
when you assume that DBpedia needs a license in the first place. As there is
little time left in which this change can be made, I urge you all to
Hoi,
I have been evaluating DBpedia. What I would like to see is use DBpedia to
improve the quality and consistency of Wikipedia itself and make use of its
curated data for an experiment where Semantic MediaWiki will be enabled for
a copy of English language Wikipedia. This would mean that DBpedia
Hoi,
There is a discussion on the Foundation-l about the licensing of Wikipedia.
There are two things I want to ask.
- Wikipedia is likely to change to the CC-by-sa license, if you intend to
follow the license of Wikipedia, are you intending to follow suit ?
- It is said that the dump of