Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] [Dbpedia-ontology] Advancing the DBpedia ontology

tract vetted structured data from > Wikipedia for broader consumption on the Web of data. > > My counsel is to not let DBpedia's mission stray into questions of conceptual > "truth". Keep the ontology flat and simple with no aspirations other than > "just the facts

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] [Dbpedia-ontology] Advancing the DBpedia ontology

y a cursory cut at Dbpedia ontology requirement issues. But, it > seems the community needs to come to grips with this issue before > implementing specific changes to the existing ontology. > > John Flynn > http://semanticsimulations.com > > -Original Message- >

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] [Dbpedia-ontology] Advancing the DBpedia ontology

I get the rough cut done, I'll share the results with you and maybe we can discuss paths forward? I'm with you on the 30% error rate...that doesn't help anyone. Aaron On Feb 25, 2015, at 08:02, Vladimir Alexiev wrote: >> From: M. Aaron Bossert [mailto:maboss...@gmail.com]

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] YASGUI

a way to store queries in it > along with some notes, kind of the way that Kasabi used to work. > >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:05 PM, M. Aaron Bossert >> wrote: >> Hear, hear. I'm using the same thing in my front-ends. Way better than the >> plain code mirror

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] YASGUI

Hear, hear. I'm using the same thing in my front-ends. Way better than the plain code mirror SPARQL interface. Aaron > On Feb 18, 2015, at 11:12, Vladimir Alexiev > wrote: > > Use this to play with dbpedia or any other SPARQL endpoint: http://yasgui.org/ > Has automatic prefix insertion, cl

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] [Dbpedia-ontology] Advancing the DBpedia ontology

Vladimir, I am more than happy to work the ML problem with you. For your example of the dichotomy with the domain and range of "mother" and queen Victoria being the "mother", this begs for contextual approach to that concept Aaron > On Feb 18, 2015, at 08:03, Vladimir Alexiev > wrote: >

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Comparing two nodes on dbpedia

To find which properties they share in common: SELECT ?p ?o WHERE { ?p ?o . ?p ?o . } For paths between them, SPARQL does not have a native function to find a path at N hops other than property paths, which does not perform well at scale...but could potentially do the trick for you...just

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Freebase, Wikidata and the future of DBpedia

l/DroolsComplexEventProcessingChapter.html#d0e10852 > > and could be implemented either as a native XSD data type or by some > structure involving "blank" nodes. > > > >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:22 AM, M. Aaron Bossert >> wrote: >> Martin, >&g

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Freebase, Wikidata and the future of DBpedia

Martin, When I first started working with RDF, I didn't fully "get" the full expressivity of it. All of the things you are saying can't be done (perhaps, easily?) are quite simple to implement. When compared to the property graph model, RDF, at first glance, seems inferior, but in reality, is

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Advancing the DBpedia ontology

I would like to help. I cannot travel much, but I do have access to a shared memory supercomputer and a large Hadoop appliance if anyone is interested in applying some new techniques for modeling the ontology. I work for Cray. Aaron > On Jan 24, 2015, at 08:54, Dimitris Kontokostas > wrote:

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBPedia SPARQL query poblems

Try this... I believe you have the order reversed...the items it appears you are looking for have the cloud platform as their screens:subject: > PREFIX dcterms: > > SELECT DISTINCT ?platform > WHERE { > { ?platform dcterms:subject >

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] dbpedia-lookup-index

ne >> >>> On 14 Nov 2014, at 08:36, Max Jakob wrote: >>> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> There are instructions on how to build an index in the readme: >>> https://github.com/dbpedia/lookup#rebuilding-the-index >>> >>> I'm

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] dbpedia-lookup-index

; Hi everyone, >>> >>> There are instructions on how to build an index in the readme: >>> https://github.com/dbpedia/lookup#rebuilding-the-index >>> >>> I'm sure many users would be pleased to see an updated index for Lookup. If >>> somebody

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] dbpedia-lookup-index

Sorry to piggyback, but I was actually just about to ask the same question. I have downloaded the 2014 dataset as well as the live changesets and would like to have an index that stays current...any suggestions for how to do this? Aaron > On Nov 12, 2014, at 05:17, Csaba Veres wrote: > > Hi,