DBpedia HTML interface, we will link to the provenance view
>
>
> Note that we will also allow outside datasets to be linked and advertised soon
> (January), see the prototype here:
> http://kurzum.net/dbpedia_banner/Siemens.html
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sebastian
>
>
A big hurrah about the new DBpedia releases, as announced in
https://blog.dbpedia.org/2018/10/17/the-release-circle-a-glimpse-behind-the-scenes/
Is there documentation on what shows up where in
http://downloads.dbpedia.org/repo/lts/
For example, where can I find triples that look like
dbr:Ronald
lts forever,
> others in /dev/. dev data will be deleted after a year or so.
>
> All the best,
> Sebastian
>
> On September 12, 2018 5:50:27 AM GMT+02:00, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider"
> wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
> Thanks for the answers.
>
> So
to download and self install
>
> - professional support for running it locally
>
> - paid service (with a reduction for members) to make it more reliable.
>
> Actually, it is almost a classical open source model.
>
> All the best,
>
> Sebastian
>
>
>
ere
> <https://dbpedia-slack.herokuapp.com/> to sign in!
>
> Best,
>
> Julia
>
>
> Am 11.09.2018 um 10:42 schrieb Elmahdi Korfed:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> You can use the sourceforge to access archive emails
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/dbpedia/mailman/message/36
In the developers' mailing list there is a comment about moving communication
to a channel on slack.
How can I look at the archives of that channel?
peter
___
DBpedia-discussion mailing list
DBpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourc
Hi:
It seems that DBpedia live hasn't been updating since May.
The most recent changeset at http://live.dbpedia.org/changesets/ is from 17 May.
Is DBpedia live dead, or is it just resting?
peter
--
Check out the vibran
As I am just in the middle of trying to put together a high-quality
information base using DBpedia 2016-10, I'll vote strongly for more-frequent
extractions at the expense of dropping some of the datasets.
The problem that I have run into is that there are some major errors in at
least the Italian
gy and mappings.
> Since you already spotted some mappings mistakes, I would kindly ask you
> to contribute and edit the mappings to your contentment.
As I stated above, I don't have the linguistic expertise to completely
understand what is going on in most languages, so I am leery abo
the creation of template (stumps), based on similar templates in
> other languages
> 3. DBpedia fusion and type generation heuristics
>
> Sorry, don't have time to expand on this today.
>
> Best,
>
> Markus Freudenberg
>
> Release Manager, DBpedia <http://wi
these parts of DBpedia. That's regrettable, as I would
like to include as much information as possible. But what is really
problematic is that now I don't see how I can count on any DBpedia
information.
What is the way forward h
as wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
> some minor comments inline
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> mailto:pfpschnei...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Well what I was trying to do was to figure out just which of the DBpedia
> files I need to com
As it is, I don't know how long
>> the page will take to load, if it will load. Is it stuck in such a way
>> that a refresh will fix it? Is it not compatible with
>> (Edge|Chrome|Firefox|Safari|...)
>>
>> I am left pining for the bad old days of HTML pages (n
are either temporary
> files which need not be published.
>
> Best,
>
> Markus Freudenberg
>
> Release Manager, DBpedia <http://wiki.dbpedia.org>
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> mailto:pfpschnei...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
&
Hi:
Is there a roadmap to the 2016-10 dumps. I'm having trouble finding some of
the stuff that I think should be there (particularly the links to Wikidata).
Or maybe there are files that should have content but don't.
downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/core-i18n/wikidata/wikipedia_links_wikidata.ttl.
disjoint union of several other classes. If there is a need for such
definitions anyway then the cost of using a powerful ontology language
is paid already so it may as well be also used to define classes in terms
of property values.
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Nuance
One reason to have a subclass structure under Person (but also under any
natural kind) is to support generalizations for subcategories. Many of the
subclasses of Person in DBpedia are for occupations, e.g., Architect, Athlete,
NascarDriver, Politician, and Senator. If these subclasses of Person a
p://dbpedia.org/ontology/schoolPatron>
<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf>
<http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#sameSettingAs> .
How have such questionable statements ended up in the DBpedia
ontology matches Wikipedia.
The current DBpedia is not nonsense. The density of errors is quite low. I
would certainly like for there to be fewer errors in DBpedia and, in
particular, that Wikipedia infelicities that are identified by using DBpedia
are fixed in Wikipedia.
> - Jeff
peter
&g
> to doctrine, etc.
>
> It is definitely not an area you will get complete agreement on!
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider"
> To: "Sebastian Hellmann"
> Cc: "DBpedia"
> Sent: 7/14/2017 12:31:40 PM
> Sub
x27;t
state it (primeness of numbers for example).
By the way, superclasses would have a subset of the properties of their
subclasses, not a superset.
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Nuance Communications
--
Check out the vi
Where is the parallel cleanup of the ontology happening?
peter
On 07/05/2017 08:58 AM, Sebastian Hellmann wrote:
> Hi John,
>
>
> On 05.07.2017 17:43, John Flynn wrote:
>>
>> I have long been curious about the DBpedia ontology structure so I just took
>> a look at the ontology represented in
>>
What are examples of SHACL-like constraints that could be used in the ontology
cleanup?
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Nuance Communications
On 06/27/2017 03:28 AM, Sebastian Hellmann wrote:
> Hi Ismael, all,
>
> we were brainstorming for a while now and your Google Summer of Code projec
thological beings who
have different fathers in different accounts. Nevertheless it is useful to
state that father is functional.
What then to do about spouse? I'm not sure.
> All the best,
> Sebastian
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Nuance Communications
---
Wikipedia
articles. (Wikipedia does identify churches with buildings, but at least
using this the informal definition of a church would let DBpedia
contributors know what a DBpedia church should be.)
peter
On 02/24/2015 08:15 PM, Vladimir Alexiev wrote:
>> From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider [
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I agree that there are problems with the mappings. However, how can the
mappings be fixed without fixing the ontology?
peter
On 02/18/2015 05:03 AM, Vladimir Alexiev wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> My presentations from the Dublin meeting are at
>
> -
tracted data so we definitely want them. For the rest, we
> are open to suggestions and this is one of the reasons we invite ontology
> experts to participate.
>
> Best, Dimitris
>
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> mailto:pfpschnei...@gmail.com>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good points all, I think.
As well I would like to know what expressive power is being considered for
the ontology language. For example, will disjointness axioms be allowed, or
local ranges, or constraints?
peter
On 01/23/2015 12:23 PM, Nicolas To
Along these lines, there are some questionable mappings in DBpedia.
One in particular, is for the building infobox, which is overused in English
Wikipedia. In particular, the Eiffel Tower Wikipedia entry uses this infobox
even though the Eiffel Tower is the most prominent non-building on
http:
Wikipedia defines building as "a man-made structure with a roof and walls
standing more or less permanently in one place" and "intended for human use
or occupation" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Building]. Wikipedia also
suggests examining http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonbuilding_structure for
exam
I agree that a way forward would be to use a well-defined ontology, and set up
themappings from infoboxes to map into that ontologyinstead of the DBpedia
ontology. This would require, I think, a more powerfulmapping technology,
one that can use arbitrary combinations of the infobox information
Deferring to Wikipedia is definitely one of the things that DBpedia should do,
but that cannot be done completely blindly.
For example, Guantanamo Naval Base uses the military structure infobox, but
there is no way that the entire base can be considered to be a military
structure.Either a diffe
I agree that it seems harder to crowdsource ontologies. However, Wikipedia
seems to have a half-decent organization, so maybe it is possible. My view is
that Wikipedia is succeeding, and not just in overall organization, because
there are Wikipedia editors that challenge and remove incorrect an
pfps (see also below).
peter
On 04/15/2014 04:20 PM, Alexandru Todor wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Please tell us your user name in the mappings wiki so we can assign you
> editor rights.
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandru
>
> On Apr 16, 2014 2:04 AM, "Patel-Schneider, Peter"
> mailto:peter.patel-schnei...@nua
On 04/13/2014 06:32 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Regarding class usage, the Dutch chapter does a great job already and
> Magnus' query returns no results;) [1]
> This means that all classes are needed at the moment.
>
> Regarding the changes, I am also in favor to move forward and
35 matches
Mail list logo
