Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Working Draft

ust a small graphviz graph would help clarify what you are saying. Sent from my iPad On 15 Dec 2017, at 17:54, Sebastian Samaruga wrote: Hi all, I know I've been publishing a series of posts that maybe lacks of academic formality or shape / coherence. My intentions are not to spam the list

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] "Team" members wanted

Sorry again, here goes the right link: https://github.com/CognescentBI/BISemantics/blob/master/Document.pdf?raw=true Best, Sebastián Samaruga --- http://exampledotorg.blogspot.com.ar/2017/09/hi-everyone-im-sebastian-software.html On Nov 6, 2017 11:06 PM, "Sebastian Samaruga" wr

[DBpedia-discussion] Does this makes any sense?

https://github.com/CognescentBI/BISemantics/raw/master/Algoritmo.pdf Best, Sebastián Samaruga --- http://exampledotorg.blogspot.com.ar/2017/09/hi-everyone-im-sebastian-software.html Algoritmo.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document

[DBpedia-discussion] The ‘Web’ that’s missing in the Semantic Web

Original Web was made for human interchange and consumption of rendered linked resources. Web 2.0 added the possibility of read and also write those resources. The current focus in the Semantic Web is that their resources are for ‘machine’ consumption. That’s great as machines are concerned, they

[DBpedia-discussion] Crowfunding

As my current development efforts have been all with no fundings for now at all (I'm not working for any company nor academia for the last couple of years developing this project) I've decided to try to do my best with this campaign becoming an *startup*: https://www.indiegogo.com/project/preview

[DBpedia-discussion] Naive datasource merge algorithm

Hi all, AFAIK an algorithm cannot be patented so I'll be disclosing what I think could be a way for merging different databases with, lets say, records representing the same entities but in different schemas. I'll be using SW (RDF Quads) as long some custom made type inference with sample stateme

[DBpedia-discussion] "Team" members wanted

ayout at all) where I'm dumping thoughts regarding a future implementation: https://github.com/CognescentBI/BISemantics Best, Sebastián Samaruga. Cory Casanave *From:* Sebastian Samaruga [mailto:ssama...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, October 27, 2017 11:26 AM *To:* W3C Semantic Web IG ; p

[DBpedia-discussion] "Team" members wanted

Team members wanted (for a project that doesn't yet exist): Hi, I'm just creating 'CognescentBI' as an organization into GitHub for initially hosting the proyect 'BISemantics' where I'll be pushing all the development efforts regarding a Business Integration platform for the Web of Data. https://

[DBpedia-discussion] Internation-al turnaround thoughts

https://exampledotorg.blogspot.com.ar/2017/10/internation-al-turnaround-thoughts.html Regards, Sebastián. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.lin

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Semantic Web Browser

RDF based - but it's not the semantic web as we know it. And so > out of scope for this forum. > > Maybe it's time to dust off some old code. :-) > > *Lee Curtis* | *M:* +61 ( <+61%20438%20256%20875>0) 438 256 875 > <+61%20438%20256%20875> > > > On 12 Oc

[DBpedia-discussion] Semantic BI

Hi, I've been updating my drafts and blog: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-yi9kK2_6kSoNX_DEX0IsbU-nvwv6TAZfAoMrpm6TqE/edit?usp=drivesdk http://exampledotorg.blogspot.com https://github.com/ssamarug/semantic-bi I'll be glad if someone can help me regarding QA/NLP state of the art in the re

[DBpedia-discussion] Updates

Hi all! The documentation regarding ongoing efforts in the development of a SBI (Semantic Business Integration) framework, API and related artifacts is being updated in Google drive at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OqsVn6uo0cr6qruzWj9yRASrmvAIAf4HsHuLS2aRSy8/edit?

[DBpedia-discussion] Discussions

I'll try to start again, this time with the right foot, in the realm of discussions regarding the related topics of this lists. I know I've posted compulsively whatever things I've wrote. Some people where really kind with me, answering with patience. But my learning process seems to be slower and

[DBpedia-discussion] Feedback: SW Protocol?

Basically what I'm obsessed with (and I need a lot more background in graph theory and other disciplines) is that given that SW and the rest are forms of SPO graph based DBs using resources and a fancy serialization format for the web using URIs (kind of RESTfully / dereferenceable) is the possibi

[DBpedia-discussion] Protocol

Hi, newbie question again: what if a 'protocol' can be regarded as an issue for the 'data web' as there is one for the traditional 'document web'. The question is: does the design issues (ex.: RESTful application design patterns) of a document resource centric web holds (or at least part of them) f

[DBpedia-discussion] Refurbished draft thoughts II...

Hi, I've tried to state in a document again what I'd like to solve. This time I'm trying not to focus on how I'd like to implement things but more in what I'd like to have implemented. At the end (of the document also) I state the most important thing I'd like to do: to be able to build better web

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Refurbished draft thoughts...

tract entities. Both activities reduce the effort, cost and > risk for dealing with the diversity of approaches, standards and > technologies. > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki > [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/ > > > On 29 Jul 2017, at 07:05, Sebastian Samaruga wrote: > &g

[DBpedia-discussion] Semantic Web Browser

I'm trying to clean up my last posted documents. I'd like to know if it is possible to build a 'browser' or client for the Semantic Web as they exist for HTML5. I think SW should do for 'data' what traditional Web (2.0) did for document sharing. We ended up building 'applications' (software user i

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Trying again...

this could be helpful for whatever ontologies classes and instances modeling due to ontology alignment. A goal for me will be to allow to not need to have a previous knowledge of sources / schemas for being able to work with them. Regards, Sebastian. On Jul 16, 2017 2:01 PM, "Sebastian Samaruga

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Purpose of the DBpedia Ontology was Re: Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

Roles? (Actor / Role pattern in OOP). I call it 'metaclasses' using the 'kind' abstraction of type inference by aggregation of common properties and their values. RDF allows for a class to be instance (not subclass) of another class. Also OWL restrictions could be used to model roles. Regards, Seb

[DBpedia-discussion] Trying again...

tion of service contracts and exposing a plain RDF IO (dialog protocol) interface. A Node Binding to other Nodes shall allow to integrate via dataflow semantics diverse datasources / datastores. --- Best Regards, Sebastian Samaruga. ---

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Purpose of the DBpedia Ontology was Re: Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

n-fictitious. Which > > would exclude the need for Cyborg and other strange classes with no > actual > > instances outside fiction. > > > > > > Marcelo Jaccoud Amaral > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Hellmann gravou em > 2017-07-11 >

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

BRAS > Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicações - Arquitetura (TIC/ARQSERV/ARQTIC) > user-id: bi70 > ramal: 706-7507 > > tel: +55 (21) 2116-7507 > = > dum loquimur, fugetir invida aetas: carpe diem, quam minimum credula > postero.

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

Question: isn't it possible to 'aggregate' classes of subjects in respect to the properties / predicates some set of subjects have in common. Example: a Person class subjects would have 'birthPlace', 'birthDate' and 'name' properties and an Artist subclass would have those properties of Person plus