Hi Dimitris,
I've just noticed there's an highlighted 'missing ref' in the 'ontology
consistency check' section. The references are:
A. Pohl at WoLE 2012
A. Gangemi at ISWC 2012
A. Aprosio at ESWC 2013
Could you please add them?
Thank you in advance.
Cheers!
Marco
On 3/28/13 11:40 AM, Pablo N.
All links are missing. I think they are important.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote:
> I think it is better this way.
> DBpedia.org has a very strange markdown / wiki format and it took me too
> long to convert the gdoc.
> BTW, I also removed some text from JC's ideas
I think it is better this way.
DBpedia.org has a very strange markdown / wiki format and it took me too
long to convert the gdoc.
BTW, I also removed some text from JC's ideas because they were breaking
the formatting
Cheers,
Dimitris
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Pablo N. Mendes wrote:
>
>
I noticed. I assume that from now on, comments go via e-mail and final
changes should be added directly to the wiki?
Cheers,
Pablo
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
>
> I disabled the editing of GDoc, we will use the wiki page from now on
> wiki.dbpedia.or
Hi Pablo,
I disabled the editing of GDoc, we will use the wiki page from now on
wiki.dbpedia.org/gsoc2013/ideas
Cheers,
Dimitris
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Pablo N. Mendes wrote:
>
> Please enable commenting on the Google Doc. I have spotted typos
> " Identifiers and data provided by DB
Please enable commenting on the Google Doc. I have spotted typos
" Identifiers and data provided by DBpedia was greatly involved in creating
this knowledge graph." -> identifiers and data ... were
I also have comments about ideas:
"Mapping service from Wikidata properties to DBpedia ontology" ->
On 27 March 2013 21:47, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt wrote:
> On 27 March 2013 17:47, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
>> On 27 March 2013 15:51, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt wrote:
>>> Hi Jimmy,
>>>
>>> thanks for your tips! I added/extended two ideas yesterday. I ended up
>>> at six to eight paragraphs with 4
On 27 March 2013 17:47, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
> On 27 March 2013 15:51, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt wrote:
>> Hi Jimmy,
>>
>> thanks for your tips! I added/extended two ideas yesterday. I ended up
>> at six to eight paragraphs with 400 to 500 words. Do you think that's
>> too long? The 2012 ideas I
On 27 March 2013 15:51, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt wrote:
> Hi Jimmy,
>
> thanks for your tips! I added/extended two ideas yesterday. I ended up
> at six to eight paragraphs with 400 to 500 words. Do you think that's
> too long? The 2012 ideas I looked at were shorter.
What I intended to say didn
