Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] [Dbpedia-developers] DBpedia and disambiguations

2013-10-21 Thread Andrea Di Menna
I could try but I am sure Jona knows exactly all the changes on the dump branch and could merge it more easily :-) For what regards the magic word it is required to be in the article itself, either directly or transcluded. But of course it is easier to modify the disambiguation templates other tha

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] [Dbpedia-developers] DBpedia and disambiguations

2013-10-21 Thread Pablo N. Mendes
The branches should be merged, of course. It's a matter of checking with Jona when. Or would Andrea be up for the challenge? Also, is this magic word within the template definitions or within the disambiguation pages? On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Andrea Di Menna wrote: > On top of this: >