Hi Karel,
On 09/19/2011 11:33 AM, karel braeckman wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have let the dbpintegrator run over the weekend, but it got stuck
> again (same behavior as mentioned before: Virtuoso stuck at 100% CPU
> use). The good news is we think we found the problem.
>
> We found something strange
Hi Guys,
I have let the dbpintegrator run over the weekend, but it got stuck
again (same behavior as mentioned before: Virtuoso stuck at 100% CPU
use). The good news is we think we found the problem.
We found something strange in the update file with triples to delete
where things got stuck. The
Hi Mohamed,
You were right, I checked my settings and the tool does start at the
correct date. I must have done something wrong earlier.
Best regards,
Karel
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Mohamed Morsey
wrote:
> Hi Karel,
>
> On 09/16/2011 04:51 PM, karel braeckman wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>>
Hi Karel,
On 09/16/2011 04:51 PM, karel braeckman wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> First of all, thanks for all the suggestions. I changed my settings
> according to your suggestions, and at first the problem was the same
> (100% CPU for quite a while when deleting triples) but after a while
> (~10 minutes)
On 9/16/11 10:51 AM, karel braeckman wrote:
-16-16-01), could this be a bug?
@Mohamed:
It really did take two days to fill the store with the DBpedia live
dump. Initially it was fast, but it got slower and slower. There
already was the default DBpedia dump (not the live version) inserted
int
Hi Karel,
On 09/16/2011 04:51 PM, karel braeckman wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> First of all, thanks for all the suggestions. I changed my settings
> according to your suggestions, and at first the problem was the same
> (100% CPU for quite a while when deleting triples) but after a while
> (~10 min
Hi guys,
First of all, thanks for all the suggestions. I changed my settings
according to your suggestions, and at first the problem was the same
(100% CPU for quite a while when deleting triples) but after a while
(~10 minutes) Virtuoso completed the action and now the tool seems to
be running ok
Hi Karel,
> Forgot to mention the machine details:
>
> 24GB RAM
> 2x quadcore Xeon E5540 2.5GHz
> Virtuoso data is on SSD disks
Your parameters look ok, but you may want to try adding the following:
[Parameters]
...
DefaultIsolation = 2
...
which sets a different
On 9/16/11 9:41 AM, karel braeckman wrote:
And the Virtuoso config is a single instance:
OpenLink Virtuoso version 06.01.3127, on Linux
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu), Single Edition
There are currently about 300M triples in the store. I read that 500M
per 16GB or RAM should still run ok, so I don'
Hi Karel,
First of all try these settings which we use for our DBpedia-Live
virtuoso instance:
NumberOfBuffers= 80
MaxDirtyBuffers= 60
and please don't forget to restart you Virtuoso server after changing
those settings, in order for them to take effect.
Secondly
And the Virtuoso config is a single instance:
OpenLink Virtuoso version 06.01.3127, on Linux
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu), Single Edition
There are currently about 300M triples in the store. I read that 500M
per 16GB or RAM should still run ok, so I don't think a clustered
version should be necessa
Forgot to mention the machine details:
24GB RAM
2x quadcore Xeon E5540 2.5GHz
Virtuoso data is on SSD disks
Regards,
Karel
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:57 PM, karel braeckman
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We tried setting up DBpedia Live on one of our local servers and keep it in
> sync with the official
Hi all,
We tried setting up DBpedia Live on one of our local servers and keep it in
sync with the official DBpedia live, using the dbpintegrator tool. Our setup
is documented here: http://medialoep.vrtmedialab.be/blog/?p=96.
However, adding / deleting triples from / to Virtuoso has become extreme
13 matches
Mail list logo
