Hello,
Paul Houle schrieb:
> Jens Lehmann wrote:
> I ran it through a converter last night and got a document that,
> like yours, contained blank nodes. These are implicit in the RDF-XML,
> but need to be named in order to be serialized as NT. That's one
> substantial difference betwe
Jens Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Paul Houle schrieb:
>
>> Any chance we could get the OWL ontology in NT as well?
>>
>
> It can be converted of course:
> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.2/en/dbpedia-ontology.nt
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jens
>
I ran it through a converter last night a
Hello,
Paul Houle schrieb:
>
> Any chance we could get the OWL ontology in NT as well?
It can be converted of course:
http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.2/en/dbpedia-ontology.nt
Kind regards,
Jens
--
Dipl. Inf. Jens Lehmann
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
Homepage: htt
Paul Houle wrote:
> A minor inconsistency I've noticed in dbpedia is that the OWL
> ontology is represented in RDF/XML, while the rest of dbpedia is in NT.
>
> I like NT. I've got a special-purpose NT parser that works very
> well with dbpedia. (I found that many commercial & OS RDF to
A minor inconsistency I've noticed in dbpedia is that the OWL
ontology is represented in RDF/XML, while the rest of dbpedia is in NT.
I like NT. I've got a special-purpose NT parser that works very
well with dbpedia. (I found that many commercial & OS RDF tools can't
handle the dbped
