Hi,
as most of you probably know, there are two different proposals for how to
encapsulate SCTP and DCCP inside UDP.
One approach proposes two protocol-specific encapsulation schemes (described in
draft-tuexen-sctp-udp-encaps and draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap).
The second approach proposes a generi
Resending as I wasn't subscribed to dccp and it bounced - followups across
tsvwg and tsv-area as well, please.
Lloyd Wood
http://tinyurl.com/lloydwood-ccsr
From: tsv-area-boun...@ietf.org [tsv-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
l.w...@surrey.ac.uk [l.w..
On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:50 AM,
wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-00#section-3.3
section 3.3 of the draft and its use of UDP as UDP-lite -- despite
UDP-lite being given a different protocol number because consensus
was that messing with UDP checksum and length fiel