[dccp] UDP encaps for SCTP and SCCP

2010-04-22 Thread Lars Eggert
Hi, as most of you probably know, there are two different proposals for how to encapsulate SCTP and DCCP inside UDP. One approach proposes two protocol-specific encapsulation schemes (described in draft-tuexen-sctp-udp-encaps and draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap). The second approach proposes a generi

[dccp] FW: UDP encaps for SCTP and SCCP

2010-04-22 Thread L.Wood
Resending as I wasn't subscribed to dccp and it bounced - followups across tsvwg and tsv-area as well, please. Lloyd Wood http://tinyurl.com/lloydwood-ccsr From: tsv-area-boun...@ietf.org [tsv-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of l.w...@surrey.ac.uk [l.w..

Re: [dccp] UDP encaps for SCTP and SCCP

2010-04-22 Thread Pasi Sarolahti
On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:50 AM, wrote: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-00#section-3.3 section 3.3 of the draft and its use of UDP as UDP-lite -- despite UDP-lite being given a different protocol number because consensus was that messing with UDP checksum and length fiel