Re: [dccp] minimal sending rate in the case of tfrc for small packetsand its faster restart variant

2006-05-10 Thread Vlad Balan
. Do perhaps the draft-ietf-dccp-tfrc-voip-05 or draft-ietf-dccp-tfrc-faster-restart-00 have a different perspective on this? I remember that the faster restart variant mentioned that the rate should not be reduced to less than eight small packets per RTT. Best Regards, Vlad Balan Arjuna

Re: [dccp] minimal sending rate in the case of tfrc for small packets and its faster restart variant

2006-06-22 Thread Vlad Balan
opposed to sending eight small packets in the first RTT. For this reason, I would like to know which of the two methods of computation (using one of the two choices for the packet size) should be used in deciding the bound for the minimal rate during a period of idleness. Best Regards, Vlad Balan

Re: [dccp] DCCP voice quality experiments

2006-09-29 Thread Vlad Balan
Hi Eddie,I'll try to answer your second point, and I believe Lars can answer much betterthe questions relating to TCP. I disagree with part of the discussion.  In Section V you say that the "secondissue" is that "The initial window during slow-start-restart is the minimumsending rate, which is o

Re: [dccp] Re: [PATCH 2/25]: Avoid accumulation of large send credit

2007-04-18 Thread Vlad Balan
Exactly, we encountered some problems also with the KAME implementation when running over links with very small delays (in the millisecond range). The problem was that the connection would choke and require a long time in order to recover. We suspected some possible bugs in the implementation (ari

Re: [dccp] DCCP for VoIP

2007-08-15 Thread Vlad Balan
Hi Ingemar, Arjuna is conducting the latest simulations on the topic of VoIP-DCCP interaction and therefore he should have the best view of the current state of affairs. Let me just point you to another draft that addresses how restart after idle periods of different lenghts is handled by the TFRC