| > I can see the following alternatives, what is your stance regarding:
| > (a) keep as it is (probably not agreeing due to this email?)
| > (b) keep principle, but use at socket creation (glitch comes possibly
later, but will still occur)
| > (c) ditch principle and use even lower granula
Em Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:31:13AM +0100, Gerrit Renker escreveu:
> Quoting Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
> | > [DCCP]: Provide 10s of microsecond timesource
> | >
> | > This provides a timesource, conveniently used for DCCP timestamps, which
> | > returns the elapsed time in 10s of microseconds
Quoting Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
| > [DCCP]: Provide 10s of microsecond timesource
| >
| > This provides a timesource, conveniently used for DCCP timestamps, which
| > returns the elapsed time in 10s of microseconds since initialisation.
| > This makes for a wrap-around time of about 11.9
Em Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 08:00:16PM +0100, Gerrit Renker escreveu:
> [DCCP]: Provide 10s of microsecond timesource
>
> This provides a timesource, conveniently used for DCCP timestamps, which
> returns the elapsed time in 10s of microseconds since initialisation.
> This makes for a wrap-around ti
[DCCP]: Provide 10s of microsecond timesource
This provides a timesource, conveniently used for DCCP timestamps, which
returns the elapsed time in 10s of microseconds since initialisation.
This makes for a wrap-around time of about 11.9 hours, which should be
sufficient for most applications.
S
5 matches
Mail list logo
