Re: systemtap networking tapsets was: Re: [RFC]: field name identifier conventions

2007-10-25 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 03:03:55PM +0100, Gerrit Renker escreveu: > | The full sources for the tapsets used (for things like > ccid3_hc_tx_sk_rtt(), etc) are at: > | > | http://oops.ghostprotocols.net:81/acme/nettaps.tar.bz2 > | > This is awesome. Is all that is needed to run these a new sys

Re: systemtap networking tapsets was: Re: [RFC]: field name identifier conventions

2007-10-25 Thread Gerrit Renker
| The full sources for the tapsets used (for things like ccid3_hc_tx_sk_rtt(), etc) are at: | | http://oops.ghostprotocols.net:81/acme/nettaps.tar.bz2 | This is awesome. Is all that is needed to run these a new systemtap binary? Mine is 0.5.9 and too old for that, and I need to do some rtfm

Re: systemtap networking tapsets was: Re: [RFC]: field name identifier conventions

2007-10-24 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 02:35:42PM +0100, Gerrit Renker escreveu: > Quoting Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: > | > I think that dccpprobe.c is the wrong name ... it should really be > called ccid3_probe.c ... > | > I have been working on printing entries for CCID2, since in ccid2.c > there is no probe

Re: systemtap networking tapsets was: Re: [RFC]: field name identifier conventions

2007-10-24 Thread Gerrit Renker
Quoting Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: | > I think that dccpprobe.c is the wrong name ... it should really be called ccid3_probe.c ... | > I have been working on printing entries for CCID2, since in ccid2.c there is no probe support, | > and instead ccid2_pr_debug is used for the same purpose all o

Re: systemtap networking tapsets was: Re: [RFC]: field name identifier conventions

2007-10-24 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:11:18PM +0100, Gerrit Renker escreveu: > | > | perhaps one that could understand types and then could allow > developers > | > | to ask questions like "show me all the places where the field foo of > | > | type bar appears" > | > Hopefully in the next generation o

Re: systemtap networking tapsets was: Re: [RFC]: field name identifier conventions

2007-10-24 Thread Gerrit Renker
| > | perhaps one that could understand types and then could allow developers | > | to ask questions like "show me all the places where the field foo of | > | type bar appears" | > Hopefully in the next generation of such things may be possible? I was

systemtap networking tapsets was: Re: [RFC]: field name identifier conventions

2007-10-22 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
CCing dccp@vger.kernel.org, since I wrote a nice description about this new toy :) Em Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 03:24:41PM +0100, Gerrit Renker escreveu: > | perhaps one that could understand types and then could allow developers > | to ask questions like "show me all the places where the field foo o