Re: 2/13/70a mislabeled 2/12/70

2003-01-26 Thread Charlie Miller
One of the main reasons this is still going on is due to the fact that gdlive.com has it on their server listed as 2/12/70...cm - Original Message - From: Tim Anderson To: Jim Powell ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 1:51 PM Subject: Re: 2/13/70a mislabeled 2/12/70 --

Re: 2/13/70a mislabeled 2/12/70

2003-01-26 Thread Tim Anderson
--- Jim Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tim Anderson & Serafin & Bear are of course free to > create as much > confusion as they want, but I really think the rest > of us have spent ample > time on this question. Jim: I don't believe I was sticking my nose in this controversy beyond pointi

2/13/70a mislabeled 2/12/70

2003-01-26 Thread Jim Powell
Part of the 2/13/70 Early Show has been in circulation mislabeled "2/12/70" for more than 20 years. We proved that it was mislabeled back in the mid 80s. We proved it again a few years ago. Everyone is familiar with Bear's notions about 2/13-14/70. All the evidence proves him wrong. And all t

TOO Tree 2 | 22, 23, 24, and 26 November 2002

2003-01-26 Thread Scott A. Sekerak
An "audio only" TREE will be conducted for the second segment of TOO 2002 Fall Tour. This segment, which will require twelve (12) disks, involves the following shows: 22 November 2002 | Hartford, CT 23 November 2002 | Philadelphia, PA 24 November 2002 | Philadelphia, PA 26 November 2002 | NY