The setlist I posted to deadlists years ago is correct.
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Wallis
To: kevin weil
Cc: Charlie Miller ; deadlists@nemesis.cs.berkeley.edu ;
jo...@john.rutgers.edu
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: correction to entry for
yes, something was posted in 2004 that has the correct list and proposes set
breaks, but since Andy L. never responded, the break part has never been
clear. it looks like that archive.org then simply used what was on
deadlists without verifying against what was transferred to them.
nevertheless,
I'm pretty sure I sent an email saying the same thing when i transferred the
dat. I guess nobody saw that.
- Original Message -
From: kevin weil
To: 'Christopher Wallis' ; deadlists@nemesis.CS.Berkeley.EDU ;
jo...@john.rutgers.edu
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:51 PM
Subj
Thanks - that's what the mailing list is for, making corrections.
Of note is that even archive.org's description is out of sync with the order
of the songs. I believe that description is what was used on Deadlists.
Also, it's not clear if there's a set break, or its all one set and its not
clear
Hello,
if you listen to the song transitions in the show as posted here:
http://www.archive.org/details/gd71-03-24.sbd.miller.25313.flac16
you will immediately see that that is the correct song order and that the
entry in Deadlists is currently wrong. (i.e. you can clearly hear the boys
tuning up
