im Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: "2/22/68" is mislabeled
>Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 19:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
>
>if it's already established that it's not as labeled b
if it's already established that it's not as labeled but something else
already in circulation, then we don't need to check it out.
I have it on good authority that the disc going around as "2/22/68" is
definitely not from that date. I can still send it out if someone wants to
try and identify its contents. But it's not 2/22/68.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN
