I'm new to deal.II and I'm having a similar problem. I'm trying to extend
the FEFieldFunction class with an extrapolated_value method that handles
this exception.
Here's the relevant method:
template
double ExtrapolatedField::
extrapolated_value(const Point &point,
I left out something important: I'm on a 8.5.0-pre version.
(I don't see a way to edit my post.)
On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 12:18:30 PM UTC+2, Alex Zimmerman wrote:
>
> I'm new to deal.II and I'm having a similar problem. I'm trying to extend
> the FEFieldFunction class with an extrapolat
I just stepped through my program with qtcreator and I found a mistake that
undermines my question. I thought I was using this extrapolated_value
method, but I was still using the parent class's value method. I imagine
that this will work once I fix that mistake. I'll update this thread if I
ma
That was indeed my problem. Silly mistake. This is why we use IDE's before
posting to the mailing list. Also an FYI for anyone who stumbles upon this
conversation with myself: I extended Function instead, adding a
FEFieldFunction as a member.
On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 2:08:57 PM UTC+2,
On 08/17/2016 10:22 AM, thomas stephens wrote:
*On to the question: *It is a fact that the vector mean curvature k_bar
is equal to the surface laplacian of the identity function id_X on the
manifold X, k_bar = laplace_beltrami id_X. Equation (4.4) in [1] is
the weak form of this identity: (k_b
On 08/17/2016 11:30 AM, thomas stephens wrote:
Currently unable to load https://www.dealii.org/ along with tutorials
(problem began at approximately 12:30pm ETD)
Yes, there is a power outage on campus in Heidelberg, Germany, where the
website is hosted. Guido says that people are working on it
All,
it is my pleasure to announce that since yesterday, my share of the
deal.II development will continue from Colorado State University.
Future user and developer workshops will therefore no longer have to
happen in the sweltering heat of Texas, but may instead be in the
beautiful state of Col
On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 2:47:18 AM UTC-7, Daniel Arndt wrote:
>
> Bruce,
>
> [...] 3. Like in 2., but for adding values to individual elements. Use
>> VectorOperation::add.
>>
>> I guess 3) is obscure. Does this mean that you are adding a new element
>> where none existed before or that
Bruce,
You were just missing
p_rho.compress(VectorOperation::insert);
after assemble_system().
Best,
Daniel
Am Mittwoch, 17. August 2016 21:01:22 UTC+2 schrieb bjpal...@gmail.com:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 2:47:18 AM UTC-7, Daniel Arndt wrote:
>>
>> Bruce,
>>
>> [...] 3. Like in 2.
