[deal.II] Instantiation of Vector< Sacado::Fad::DFad >

2019-09-06 Thread Doug
Hello again, I am trying to instantiate a Vector with an AD type such as Vector< Sacado::Fad::DFad > by changing for (SCALAR : REAL_AND_COMPLEX_SCALARS) to for (SCALAR : ALL_SCALAR_TYPES) in the instantiation file dealii/source/lac/la_parallel_vector.inst.in However, it seems 3 issues come up

Re: [deal.II] deal.II Newsletter #92

2019-09-06 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
I continue to be impressed by the incredible number of patches we receive and merge... On 9/6/19 1:05 PM, Rene Gassmoeller wrote: > Hello everyone! > > This is deal.II newsletter #92. > It automatically reports recently merged features and discussions about > the deal.II finite element libra

[deal.II] deal.II Newsletter #92

2019-09-06 Thread Rene Gassmoeller
Hello everyone! This is deal.II newsletter #92. It automatically reports recently merged features and discussions about the deal.II finite element library. ## Below you find a list of recently proposed or merged features: #8708: HDF5 Namespace documentation errors fixed (proposed by jpthiele;

Re: [deal.II] MUMPS with PETScWrappers::MPI::BlockSparseMatrix

2019-09-06 Thread David Wells
Hi Konrad, I don't think that it is possible to use MUMPS with a block matrix for exactly this reason. I think that if you want to use MUMPS you will need to copy the block matrix into a non-block matrix. Thanks, David On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 12:25 PM Konrad wrote: > Dear deal.ii community, > >

Re: [deal.II] Poisson equation, implementation of boundary values, mixed finite element, semiconductor devices

2019-09-06 Thread Konrad Wiśniewski
Wolfgang, thank you very much once again! Yes, on the picture is Ex, and potential was exactly as you described. Today I was able to correct my calculations. I changed the right hand side boundary condition to be only E=0 (what is, I think, physically correct thing to do), and after I get the

[deal.II] MUMPS with PETScWrappers::MPI::BlockSparseMatrix

2019-09-06 Thread Konrad
Dear deal.ii community, is it possible to use MUMPS with a PETScWrappers::MPI::BlockSparseMatrix? Don't find anything but I see that PETScWrappers::MPI::BlockSparseMatrix does not inherit from PETScWrappers::MatrixBase. Best, Konrad -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/

Re: [deal.II] step 64 run problem

2019-09-06 Thread Daniel Arndt
Jinhyun, I cannot reproduce that problem using nvcc-9.0 and deal.II 9.1.1. What version are you using? Does the code work if you remove that assertion in the library? Best, Daniel Am Fr., 6. Sept. 2019 um 01:52 Uhr schrieb Jinhyun Choo < jinhyun.c...@gmail.com>: > Hello, > > I've just complied

[deal.II] step-21 and 43

2019-09-06 Thread Lorenzo Campoli
Dear developers, maintainers and users, I read step-21 and 43 tutorials which are closer to my task. I'd like to ask some guidelines on how to implement a water/oil with polymer concentration in that model. We still have two phases, but in the water phase there will be two components, aqueous

[deal.II] Function parser for tensor function

2019-09-06 Thread Konrad
Dear deal.ii community, I was wondering if there is a simple way to parse input (e.g., from a parameter file) and use it similarly to the FunctionParser class (which works for vector valued functions) just for a TensorFunction. Anyone did that or something similar? Best, Konrad -- The deal.I