Timo,
Don't worry about that. I can't complain if someone else does the work no?
:)
On Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 1:07:49 p.m. UTC-4 Timo Heister wrote:
> Bruno, I already have a working implementation of the extractors on my
> machine. I just didn't get the time to clean up, write tests, and
>
Bruno, I already have a working implementation of the extractors on my
machine. I just didn't get the time to clean up, write tests, and
submit the PR. Sorry. I will try to pick this up again in the next few
days.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:26 PM Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
>
> On 3/11/21 11:10 PM,
Well, yes, I'd like to have access to individual blocks as well (i.e., M
and B), but anyway, I know what to do now.
Thanks for the example and helpful discussion.
On Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 8:58:05 AM UTC-6 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 3/14/21 3:23 PM, Andrey Volkov wrote:
> >
> > The syste
On 3/14/21 3:23 PM, Andrey Volkov wrote:
The system_matrix.block(0,0) gives access to a single block, namely *M
*(correct?). However, is there a way to access/extract _multiple blocks as a
whole block matrix_, let us say { [M B], [B 0] } or { [D E], [F G] }?
Sure, I looked at step-20/22, as
Dear Dr. Bangerth,
The system_matrix.block(0,0) gives access to a single block, namely *M
*(correct?).
However, is there a way to access/extract *multiple blocks as a whole block
matrix*, let us say { [M B], [B 0] } or { [D E], [F G] }?
Sure, I looked at step-20/22, as all I have done so far i
On 3/14/21 2:33 PM, Andrey Volkov wrote:
So, before doing this, I would like to inquire the following questions:
* Is there a functional in the deal.ii that allows extracting mentioned
above "sub-block matrix" from the global block matrix? Could recommend
something?
Yes:
system_ma
