If I may suggest, at that point, I would ask you what you are trying to
specifically achieve?
If you want to build an SPH code from scratch, this is definitely possible
to do using deal.II particle classes (esp. with the exchange and update
ghosts functionalities), but this will require a lot of
Hi all,
The recording of the talk is now available at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qJfml3_HuA
Thanks again, Bruno!
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 2:56 PM Timo Heister wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to announce the following seminar talk in our Clemson
> Computational Math seminar that is rela
Markus,
how do you define dofs_per_face? Do you adjust it for the polynomial degree?
Best
W.
On 2/11/22 10:51, 'Markus Mehnert' via deal.II User Group wrote:
*** Caution: EXTERNAL Sender ***
Hi everyone,
Instead of prescribing classical Dirichlet boundary conditions (i.e. the
values for t
Hi everyone,
Instead of prescribing classical Dirichlet boundary conditions (i.e. the
values for the solution field on the boundary) I am trying to impose the
values for a specific degree of freedom inside my material. My idea was to
iterate over all cells and their faces. Then I use the locati
Dear Wolfgang,
Thanks very much for your advice. I definitely should and will follow that.
But may I still narrow my question for a clarification (with upcoming
complexity), and as a quick question ask if adding the boundary term
through cell_rhs +=... (as above, and very similar to step-7 in term
On 2/10/22 22:51, vachan potluri wrote:
This is a very difficult operation to do even in sequential computations
unless you have an analytical description of the boundary. That's because in
principle you would have to compare the current position with all points (or
at least all v
Vachan,
On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 12:51:49 AM UTC-5 vachanpo...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Dear Dr. Wolfgang,
>
> Thank you very much for the kind reply.
>
>
>> This is a very difficult operation to do even in sequential computations
>> unless you have an analytical description of the boundary.
Dear All,
I am trying to execute step-26 (Heat Equation) in parallel with
adaptive mesh. I could execute the code with 1 processor using mpirun and
if more than one processor is used, the program returns the following error
message
---
